Moment of Inertia Problems and Conservation of Energy

Lancelot59
Messages
640
Reaction score
1
I have this situation here:

GIANCOLI.ch10.p067.jpg


I'm given the masses for the objects, as well as the radius and mass of the pulley. I have to use conservation of energy laws to find out how fast the mass on the right is going the instant it hits the ground.

I can find out what the alpha of the pulley is, and therefore the accelration of the system, but that's just kinematics. How can I use conservation of energy to do it?

How could I do it if the pulley was ideal?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lancelot59 said:
How can I use conservation of energy to do it?
Compare the total mechanical energy of the system before and after the mass falls.
 
I don't follow...

I see that there is none before, and some after, when the block b has zero potential energy, block A has potential and kinetic energy, and the pulley has rotational kinetic energy...but if I knew those values then I could just save the trouble and use kinematics.
 
Set up a conservation equation:
KE1 + PE1 = KE2 + PE2

Make sure you include the PE and KE of both masses and the pulley. You'll be able to solve for the speed of block B without using force equations or kinematics. Hint: Express all the KE terms in terms of the speed of block B.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top