Moment(torque) help (bycicle crankset)

  • Thread starter Thread starter KansaiRobot
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the total force (Ftot) applied by a cyclist on a bicycle crankset using data from a sensor that measures forces (Fx, Fy, Fz) and moments (Mx, My, Mz). The user has identified that Mz and Mx are solely generated by the vertical force (F"y), which can be calculated using the formula ||F"y||= ||Mz||/(radius of crank). However, the challenge lies in deriving the horizontal forces (F"x and F"z) from the moment My, which is influenced by both. The user suspects a proportional relationship between the forces sensed at the sensor and those applied at the pedal, seeking clarification on this connection. The conversation highlights the complexities of translating sensor data into actionable force measurements in bicycle mechanics.
KansaiRobot
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello everybody.
I would appreciate your help in something I have been thinking all day (and now I am doing an allnighter, without result ):confused: (by the way, this is not "homework" since I am not at school. I have written the questions as well)

Please take a look at the attached pic. It is a bycicle crankset. Now

1) There is a sensor in the center. It can sense Fx, Fy and Fz and also Mx, My and Mz. (where F are forces and M moments (or torques))

2) The rider applies a Total force (Ftot) in the pedal. This Total Force can be decomposed as (F"x, F"y, F"z)-> just a notation.

My problem is that I have to find Ftot and the only data I have is the force and moments in the sensor.
----------------------------------

Now, I have done this so far:

1) I can see that Mz and Mx are generated ONLY by F"y. So I guess I can find F"y quite easily:

||F"y||= ||Mz||/(radius of crank)


2) I can see that My is generated by BOTH F"x and F"z.

----------------------

Now how can I get F"x and F"z from My (data)?


On related notes what is the relationship between the forces at the pedal(F"x, F"y, F"z) and the forces at the sensor? (Fx, Fy, Fz)
THIS is KEY I think!

Any help would be greatly appreciated

Thanks
Kansai
 

Attachments

  • cranckvectors.JPG
    cranckvectors.JPG
    17.9 KB · Views: 470
Physics news on Phys.org
If the forces involved are all in the diagrams you've shown, the forces are equal and opposite in each direction and:

(Ftot)² = (Fx)² + (Fy)² + (Fz)²
 
Thanks for the reply.

I don't know if I have been misleading with my not-so-good graphics.

The user applies a force (Ftot) over the pedal.

when I draw Fx, Fy and Fz (on the sensor) what I meant was that the sensor senses forces there. I didnt mean that there are aditional forces applied there. i don't know if I made sense, sorry.

I am thinking that somehow Fx and Fz (forces "sensed" at the sensor) are proportional to F"x and F"z(real forces applied to the pedal)

Any thoughts please?
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top