Moments of Inertia Homework: Find Max Height H

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about calculating the maximum height H that a block and a thin hoop reach on a frictionless incline, the key point is that both objects are analyzed using energy conservation principles. For part a, the block's maximum height is derived as H = (1/2)(v0^2/g) based on its initial kinetic energy converting to potential energy. In part b, participants note that the hoop's moment of inertia does not affect the height reached since it slides without rolling, leading to the conclusion that it should yield the same height as the block. The consensus is that the center of mass is the relevant factor for determining height, not the moment of inertia. Thus, both objects achieve the same maximum height on the incline.
hold AP 2010
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


part a) A block of mass m slides up an incline with an initial speed v0. The incline is on an angle,
Code:
θ
, and block stops sliding at height H.
-If the incline is frictionless, determine the max height H to which the block will rise, in terms of given quantities and appropriate constants.

part b) A thin hoop of mass m and radius R slides up an incline with an initial speed v0. The incline is on an angle,
Code:
θ
, and block stops sliding at height H.
-If the incline is frictionless, determine the max height H to which the hoop will rise, in terms of H and the given quantities.


Homework Equations



thin hoop I = MR2

The Attempt at a Solution



part a)

mgH = 1/2 mv02
therefore, H = (1/2)(v02/g)

& wouldn't part b be the same answer? or am I missing something mathematically?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hold AP 2010 said:
wouldn't part b be the same answer? or am I missing something mathematically?
I agree, it should be the same. It has nothing to do with the moment of inertia of the hoop if the hoop is sliding. The centre of mass is what you have to measure the height from.

AM
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top