Momentum of a Photon - Is My Understanding Correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rohanprabhu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum Photon
AI Thread Summary
A photon’s momentum is defined as p = E/c, where E is its energy, and it can be expressed in terms of frequency as p = hν/c. When a photon collides with another particle, the change in momentum can be calculated using the formula Δp = (h/c)(f2 - f1), where f1 and f2 are the initial and final frequencies of the photon. This concept is illustrated by the Compton effect, which demonstrates how energy and momentum change during photon-particle interactions. Understanding these relationships clarifies the nature of photon momentum and its implications in physics.
rohanprabhu
Messages
410
Reaction score
2
This thing has troubled me for a long time.. but i think this is eventually starting to get clear to me.

When we say a photon has a momentum 'p', the momentum isn't it's mass times the velocity.. but it can be interpreted as: If the photon [having frequency f_1] collides with any other particle, and an elastic collision takes place.. and it's frequency now is f_2, then the momentum imparted to the particle is: \Delta p = \frac{h}{c}(f_2 - f_1)[/itex]<br /> <br /> am i right?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For a photon, momentum, p = E/c = h\nu/c, and a change would be given by

\Delta p = \frac{h}{c}{(f_2 - f_1)}, where h/c is a constant. I used nu for frequency f.
 
Astronuc said:
For a photon, momentum, p = E/c = h\nu/c, and a change would be given by

\Delta p = \frac{h}{c}{(f_2 - f_1)}, where h/c is a constant. I used nu for frequency f.

well.. i actually.. said the same thing. I don't get what you were trying to explain. Can u please explain? thanks.
 
rohanprabhu said:
well.. i actually.. said the same thing. I don't get what you were trying to explain. Can u please explain? thanks.
I was explaining that a photon of energy E and a momentum of p = E/c. When a photon scatters (interacts with a particle), there will a change in energy and momentum, and the change in p = (Ei - Ef)/c. This is demonstrated in the Compton effect.
 
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...

Similar threads

Back
Top