Momentum problem involving spring and possible harmonic motion PLEASE HELP

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on analyzing the motion of two blocks connected by a spring on a frictionless table after being pulled apart and released. Key points include the need to consider the system's center of mass and the relationship between the blocks' distances and velocities. Participants suggest setting up differential equations for each block to describe their motion, emphasizing that the heavier block will affect the spring's compression more significantly. Various methods to solve the equations are proposed, including using matrix equations or focusing on the center of mass to simplify the problem. Understanding the dynamics of the system is crucial for accurately describing the subsequent motion of the blocks.
fmilner
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two blocks mass m1 and m2 (m1 greater than m2) are joined by a spring (which can extend and compress) and both rest on a horizontal frictionless table. the blocks are pulled apart, held at rest and then released. describe and explain as fully as you can the sibsequent motion of the blocks (a well labelled velocity time graph would be suitable)

Homework Equations



P=mv F=kΔl

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is your difficulty with this problem?
 
this a question i was set, and I'm not sure how exactly how to describe the displacement time graph, what the zero value should be or whether to think of the blocks seperately or joined? would the motion be aysymmetric as one weight more than the other, as the force inward would relate to the position in the extension so acceleration a=f/m would be different for each and would the resulting momentum of the heavier block mean it compresses the spring more on one side
or am i over complicating this/
 
Have you heard of the center of mass?
 
yes...
 
So think of this system in terms of its center of mass. Does it move? Think about the distances and velocities of the two masses relative to the center of mass. Are they related in any way?
 
I personally wouldn't use the "center of mass" (a moral failing, no doubt). I would, instead, set up two equations, one for each block. Let x1 be the disance from some fixed point, in line with the line between the two blocks, to block of mass m1 and x2 the distance from the fixed point to the block of mass m2. We can, without loss of generality, that m2> m1.

Then the distance between the two blocks is m2- m1 and so m1(d^2x1/dt^2)= -k(x2-x1) while m2(d^2x2/dt^2)= k(x1- x2). That is a pair of first order differential equations which can be solved in either of two ways.

1) Differentiate the first equation to get a second derivative of x2, then use the second equation to eliminate x2, giving a fourth derivative equation for x1 alone.

2) Write the differential equation as a matrix equation for the matrix (x1, x2) and find the eigenvectors and eigenvectors of the coefficent matrix.
 
There are, obviously, many different ways to attack this problem. Using the center of mass and conservation of momentum, however, the system is reduced to a one-body problem.
 
Back
Top