Motion in one demansion, photogate timer problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter machinarium
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion Timer
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving motion in one dimension, specifically focusing on the use of photogates to measure free fall acceleration. The original poster presents a scenario where a marble is dropped through two photogates, and participants explore the relationship between the time taken for the marble to pass through the gates and the experimental value of gravitational acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the equations related to free fall and average velocity, questioning how to derive the experimental value of gravitational acceleration from the setup. There is an exploration of the implications of changing the height of the upper photogate and how it affects the calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide guidance on how to manipulate the equations to isolate variables of interest, while others clarify the assumptions made in the problem setup. There is acknowledgment of the need to reconsider initial conditions when the height of the upper gate is altered.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem is derived from a textbook and reference specific chapters and editions, indicating a structured homework context. The original poster expresses uncertainty about the correctness of their solution, prompting further discussion.

machinarium
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Please help me quick everyone, thank you in advance.

Homework Statement


http://imgkk.com/i/EasJ1d.jpg
a/We have two photogates placed as in the figure. We drop a marble through these at a negligble distance above the upper gate. The upper starts a timer as the ball passes through its beam and the second stop the timer.
Prove that the experimental magnitude of freefall acceleration is given by
[tex]g_{exp}=2\Delta{y}/{(\Delta{t}})^2[/tex]
b/ For the setup and assume that gexp =9.81m/s2, what value of [tex]\Delta{t}[/tex] would you expect to measure.
c/This time, the upper photogate is placed 0.50cm lower than the first time. But we still drop the marble from the same height as the first time.
What value of gexp at this time will you determine?

Homework Equations

[tex]a = \frac{{\Delta v}}{{\Delta t}} = \frac{{{v_2} - {v_1}}}{{{t_2} - {t_1}}}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



Based on the problem, I think that [tex]\delta{t}[/tex] is the time when the marble passes through between two gates. But if it were, I couldn't get [tex]g_{exp}=2\Delta{y}/{(\Delta{t}})^2[/tex].
If it were not, I could do like that
We have [tex]{g_{\exp }} = \frac{{\Delta v}}{{\Delta t}}[/tex]
Because v0=0,
Hence,
[tex]g_{exp}=2\Delta{y}/{(\Delta{t}})^2[/tex]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
For part a, the [itex]g_{exp}[/itex] is your free fall acceleration.

In order to prove it, start with these equations:
[tex]a=\frac{v_{2}-v_{1}}{t_{2}-t_{1}}[/tex]
as you have already written. But, also use this:
[tex]v_{avg}=\frac{\Delta y}{\Delta t}[/tex]
and rewrite it like this:
[tex]\frac{v_{1}+v_{2}}{2}=\frac{\Delta y}{\Delta t}[/tex]

In the second equation the Vavg is just the normal equation for "average" velocity, so you can rewrite it as the third equation, simply adding the two velocities (final and initial) and dividing by two (averaging them).

So use the first and third equations, to solve for "a", but remember in this case "a" IS g_exp. A little algebra is required, you can eliminate v1 because it starts from rest (v1=0).

Also you are correct, delta(t) is the time it takes to pass through the two gates. But I don't see why you say you couldn't solve for delta(t) from this:
[tex]g_{exp}=2\Delta y/(\Delta t)^{2}[/tex]
Because the only unknown in that equation is delta(t) which is what you want. The problem gives you g_exp, and delta(y) is just the distance between the two gates.

For c, you will have to redetermine the equation for g_exp because you will now have an initial velocity. Originally the ball was assumed to have an initial velocity of zero, but now that the top gate is lower, the ball will obtain some downward motion by the time it reaches the upper gate.
 
Thank you too much Oddbio.
And I want too say more clearly about part c. That is the upper gate is placed accidentaly lower than before. So the problem ask us to calculate in that accident.
(This is problem 113, chapter 2 - Motion in one dimension - Physics for Scientist and Engineers 6th edtion - Tipler Mosca - Univer of Washington)
Here is my solution, is this correct, is there something need to be corrected?
http://imgkk.com/i/5Be70O.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes they all look correct to me. Good job :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
10K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K