Motor Torque required for 4 wheel drive electric car

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the motor torque required for a four-wheel-drive electric car with a specified mass and wheel specifications. The traction force is determined using the adhesion coefficient and weight, resulting in a torque calculation of 4.67 N.mm, though it is noted that the correct unit should be N-m. Participants clarify that the calculated torque represents the maximum that can be applied without skidding, assuming constant velocity and no additional resistance factors. The term "adhesion coefficient" is equated to static friction, indicating that the wheels are expected to maintain grip on the surface. Overall, the calculations are deemed correct, but further clarification on the role of velocity and resistance is suggested.
Sandesh_10
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


There is 14 kg of mass kept on a chassis (consider chassis weightless). Chassis is having 2 identical rear wheels and 2 Steel caster ball wheels at front. Consider the weight distribution to be equal on each of the wheel. All wheels are coupled to a DC motor-gearbox (1:1) each.The Rear Wheels are having 80mm diameter and made up of rubber and the chassis car is to be moved on a dry vinyl flooring. Adhesion coefficient,μ = 0.85.
Find the motor torque required if the car is to be moved at 1.2 m/s.

Homework Equations


Torque, τ = F * D/2
F : traction force required
D: diameter of wheel

Traction force, F= β * W
W : weight
β : adhesion factor

The Attempt at a Solution


F = 0.85 * 14*9.81 = 116.74 N
and thus
τ = 116.74 * 0.080/2 = 4.67 N.mm

Are these formulations and method correct?
Where and how does the velocity comes into picture?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems to me that you have computed the maximum torque that can be applied without skidding. Since no rolling resistance or drag data have been provided, there is no lower limit to the torque required to keep the vehicle moving at a steady speed.
 
I think your calculations are correct but your units should be N-m not N.mm.
I (we) assume the velocity is constant and that the torque is merely to overcome the adhesion force.
 
barryj said:
I think your calculations are correct but your units should be N-m not N.mm.
I (we) assume the velocity is constant and that the torque is merely to overcome the adhesion force.
That assumes 'adhesion coefficient' means that the wheels are tending to stick to the floor, resulting in a constant drag as the vehicle advances. The term was unfamiliar to me so I did a little research before posting (above). As far as I can make out, it is just another term for static friction. This led me to conclude, as I said, that what has been computed in the OP is the maximum torque that can be applied without skidding.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top