Motorcycle model and tire force

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the challenges of applying tire forces in a multi-body motorcycle model using Lagrange equations. The user identified that while calculating the generalized force from the longitudinal tire force (##F_x##), the rear radius (##R_r##) appears to be disregarded, leading to incorrect torque calculations. The issue stems from the lack of generalized coordinates linking the wheel hub and the tire contact point, resulting in a misrepresentation of the applied forces. The discussion highlights the need for a more accurate representation of the torque contribution from the longitudinal force in the model.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of multi-body dynamics and Lagrange equations
  • Knowledge of motorcycle dynamics and tire force application
  • Familiarity with generalized coordinates and Jacobians
  • Basic principles of torque and force calculations in mechanical systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Investigate the application of generalized coordinates in multi-body systems
  • Explore the integration of rotational mass and angular velocity in Lagrange models
  • Learn about the impact of tire slippage on motorcycle dynamics
  • Review torque contribution calculations in rigid body dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, automotive dynamics researchers, and students studying motorcycle modeling and simulation techniques.

LucaCaiaffa
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm having issues in the application of tire forces while deriving a multi-body model of a motorcycle via Lagrange.

Immagine.png

In particular, I considered several bodies that are: swingarm, main frame,
front upper fork, front lower fork and wheels.

I suppose the wheels to have zero slippage, then knowing the wheel rear torque
as ##T## and the rear radius as ##R_r## we have that ##F_x=T/R_r##

The kinematic model is correct and also forces from suspensions (the model
have been validated).The problem arises from the application point of ##F_x##.
While calculating the generalized force from ##F_x## the rear radius disappear,
meaning that the applied force acts like if it is applied in the center of the rear wheel instead of the contact point of the tire.

This results in same vehicle acceleration but different applied torques, but i don't know how to handle this issue.

I saw that many models found the same problem, but i don't get the point why this appears.

Thank you for your support
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The represented force points in the wrong direction.
The pavement-tire contact patch is the fulcrum of a lever.
The chain applied force is at top of the rear sprocket, the reaction force is applied to the axis of the tire, which moves forward, pushing the chassis via swingarm.
 
Last edited:
LucaCaiaffa said:
While calculating the generalized force from ##F_x## the rear radius disappear
What do you mean by "it disappears"?

Lnewqban said:
The represented force points in the wrong direction.
No, it's not if it is the reaction force from the ground acting on the motorcycle.
 
jack action said:
What do you mean by "it disappears"?
I mean that there is no difference in applying the longitudinal tire force in the contact point or in the wheel hub.

This happens because no generalized coordinates relates the wheel hub and the tire contact point, and their jacobians for computing the generalized forces result the same.

For this reason I think I am "losing" a torque contribution in doing this.

Simplifying the problem, if i consider the motorcycle as a unique rigid body, I should have a torque contribution from the longitudinal force as ##T=F_xh## where ##h## is the height of the center of mass.

My model instead seems to lose the radius from the height of center of mass.
 
We will need to see your equation to help you further.

LucaCaiaffa said:
This happens because no generalized coordinates relates the wheel hub and the tire contact point,
I don't have real experience with the Lagrange equation, but can't you include the rotational wheel mass and angular velocity? The wheel angular displacement ##\theta## does relate to the motorcycle displacement ##x## with ##x= \theta R_r##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
8K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K