Multiple pulleys is driving me crazy

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alora
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Multiple Pulleys
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the complexities of calculating tensions and accelerations in a system with multiple pulleys, particularly when one pulley is movable. The user initially struggles to relate the accelerations of two masses, m1 and m2, and believes m1's acceleration should be twice that of m2. However, it is clarified that m1's acceleration is actually three times that of m2 due to the mechanics of the pulley system. The key takeaway is the importance of understanding the relationship between the movements of the masses and the constraints imposed by the ropes and pulleys. Proper application of Newton's second law and careful consideration of acceleration relationships are essential for solving the problem accurately.
Alora
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Could somebody please help me with this problem? I am very confused with calculations for multiple pulleys, especially those with movable ones...

http://www.geocities.com/cdy12/pulleys.jpg

I am supposed to find the tension forces T1 and T2, as well as the acceleration of both masses.

I can do it if the whole thing is stationary, but as soon as the masses start accelerating I just don't know what to do. Please help! :cry:
 

Attachments

  • physics.JPG
    physics.JPG
    3.3 KB · Views: 636
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!
Try to set up Newton's 2.law of motion for the two masses and the (massless) moveable pulley.
In addition, since the rope lengths are constant, relate the various accelerations to each other.
 
You may find this thread helpful for a discussion of how to determine acceleration constraints in a multiple pulley problem: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=38121

(It's practically the same problem! :smile: )
 
Thanks arildno :)

Using Newton's second law for the two masses and the movable pulley I now have 3 equations but with 4 variables (T1, T2, a1, a2) and I need to find a relationship between the two accelerations.

But something's still not right ...

Here is my reasoning:

Make the ropes R1 and R2 (with tensions T1 and T2 respectively).
Call the 10kg mass m1 and the 60kg mass m2.

As m2 moves down it pulls R1 and R2 equal distances, so if there was no R2 then m1 and m2 should have the same acceleration.

However, m1 is also attached to a movable pulley, which is then attatched to R2, so m1 is really being pulled up by R1 as well as R2.

Due to gravity on m2, both ropes are being pulled equal distances, so the magnitude of acceleration of m1 is twice that of m2.

It sounds good in my head, but the answer says that acceleration of m1 is THREE times that of m2.

What am I doing wrong?
 
Alora said:
Due to gravity on m2, both ropes are being pulled equal distances, so the magnitude of acceleration of m1 is twice that of m2.

It sounds good in my head, but the answer says that acceleration of m1 is THREE times that of m2.

What am I doing wrong?
Your error is in thinking that if one end of the rope is pulled down by a distance x, the other end must be pulled up by that same distance. This is only true with respect to the pulley that the rope attaches to. For details, see post #11 in the thread I referred to above.
 
As Doc Al explained, your error lies in confusing relative and absolute quantities (in this case, accelerations).
Now, if M2 moves downwards with acceleration a2, movable pulley P must move upwards with acceleration a2 in order of keeping rope 2 of constant length.
Hence, P and M2 moves away from each other with acceleration 2*a2.
Hence, rope 1's segment length between P and M2 increases with accelaration 2*a2.
In order to keep rope 1's total length constant, the segment of rope 1 between P and M1 must decrease with acceleration 2*a2.
But this means, that the relative acceleration of M1 to P is 2*a2; or M1's absolute accelaration is a1 is equal to 3a2
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top