Multiplication by a matrix in GL rotates a plane's basis?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mathematical concept that multiplying a matrix A by an invertible matrix g from the general linear group GL(k, ℝ) results in a new matrix &overline;A = gA that defines the same k-dimensional plane in ℝⁿ as A. The row vectors of A are linearly independent and span the plane, while the transformation by g merely rotates the basis of this plane without altering its fundamental properties. The conclusion is that the null space remains unchanged, confirming that the row space of &overline;A is identical to that of A.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of matrix multiplication and properties of linear transformations
  • Familiarity with the general linear group GL(k, ℝ)
  • Knowledge of row vectors and their role in defining vector spaces
  • Concept of null space and its relationship to row space in linear algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the general linear group GL(k, ℝ) and its applications in linear transformations
  • Explore the concept of row space and null space in depth, particularly in relation to matrix rank
  • Learn about the Grassmann manifold and its significance in geometry and topology
  • Investigate the implications of basis rotation on vector spaces and their dimensional properties
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students of linear algebra who are interested in the geometric interpretations of matrix operations and their implications in higher-dimensional spaces.

joej24
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
Let A = (a_{ij}) be a k\times n matrix of rank k.
The k row vectors, a_i are linearly independent and span a k-dimensional plane in \mathbb{R}^n.

In "Geometry, Topology, and Physics" (Ex 5.5 about the Grassmann manifold), the author states that for a matrix g\in \textrm{GL}(k,\mathbb{R}),
\overline{A} = gA defines the same plane as A because g simply rotates the basis within the k-plane.

I'm having trouble seeing this.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Let ##r_j## denote the ##j##th row of ##A##, and consider a vector ##v## that is normal to the ##k##-dimensional plane. Note that ##v## must be perpendicular to all ##r_j##, so ##r_j\cdot n=0##.

Then ##Av=0## since the ##j##th component of ##An## is ##r_j\cdot v##.

So ##\bar Av=(gA)v=g(Av)=g\mathbf 0=\mathbf0##. So ##v## is also normal to the plane defined by ##\bar A##. Since that holds for all ##(n-k)## basis vectors of the null space of ##A##, and the rank of ##\bar A## is the same as that of ##A##, the plane (its rowspace) must be the same.
 
Thank you, I understand now. When you say
andrewkirk said:
Since that holds for all ##(n-k)## basis vectors of the null space of ##A##
this means that all the ## v ## perpendicular to the ## k##-dimensional plane satisfy ## \overline{A} v = 0##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K