Multivariable Calculus: Points in a Straight Line

rmiller70015
Messages
110
Reaction score
1
Determine whether the points lie in a straight line:
1) A (2,4,2), B (3,7,-2), and C (1,3,3)
2) D (0,-5,5), E (1,-2,4), and F (3,4,2)

I'm not sure what method I need to use to show that they are or are not in a straight line. I know that the three points in a are not in a line but those in group b are in a line.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Suppose we have three points in 3d space, and their position vectors are ##\vec{a},\vec{b}## and ##\vec{c}##. If the three points are on the same line, the difference vectors ##\vec{b}-\vec{a}## and ##\vec{c}-\vec{b}## have same (or opposite) direction and their cross product ##(\vec{b}-\vec{a})\times (\vec{c}-\vec{b})## is zero.
 
I get the cross product thing, but this is from a section be for we were introduced to dot and cross products, so I can't use them.
 
rmiller70015 said:
Determine whether the points lie in a straight line:
1) A (2,4,2), B (3,7,-2), and C (1,3,3)
2) D (0,-5,5), E (1,-2,4), and F (3,4,2)

I'm not sure what method I need to use to show that they are or are not in a straight line. I know that the three points in a are not in a line but those in group b are in a line.

If A,B,C are in a straight line, C-A must be a numerical (scalar) multiple of B-A. This works in any number of dimensions, not just three.
 
Ray Vickson said:
If A,B,C are in a straight line, C-A must be a numerical (scalar) multiple of B-A. This works in any number of dimensions, not just three.

Should I use the distance formula to get the scalar then?
 
rmiller70015 said:
Should I use the distance formula to get the scalar then?

Instead of asking, just start writing out the conditions that one (vector) difference is a scalar multiple of the other, and figure out if (a) this can possibly be true; and (2) if true, the value of the scalar.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top