My Iron from the Earth: A Childhood Memory

AI Thread Summary
The object in question is a piece of iron, approximately 26mm long, with a thin layer of rust and a stone-like shape. Its composition analysis reveals 96.873% iron, with trace amounts of other elements but no nickel, which is typically found in iron meteorites. Discussions suggest it may be man-made, possibly from a mechanical part or slag from an ironworks, rather than a meteorite due to the lack of surface damage and nickel content. The object's hardness is noted, as it resists scratching by a saw, indicating it is harder than common steel. Further investigation, such as x-ray analysis, could provide more insights into its origin and composition.
qumf
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
When I was a child, I picked a iron from the earth. It looks a iron, it has a thin layer rust outside. but the shape looks like a stone. it is about 26mm long.
I erase a little rust by knife. then the position will not get rusty afterwards in the room even many years.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
until to recent days, I get a spectrum ways to test its composition.
It is strange. I do not know what it is originally.
Sn 0.048%; Mo 0.089%; Zr 0.014%; W 0.089%; Zn 0.062%; Cu 0.195%; Fe 96.873%; Mn 0.844%; Ti O.085%; LEC 0.655%(light element such as Si, C, the machine can not tell the nonmetallic element)
who can tell me what it is originally?
 

Attachments

  • 2013-02-03_22-41-55_705.jpg
    2013-02-03_22-41-55_705.jpg
    9.9 KB · Views: 521
  • 2013-02-03_22-42-11_169.jpg
    2013-02-03_22-42-11_169.jpg
    14.6 KB · Views: 499
  • 2013-02-03_22-42-19_168.jpg
    2013-02-03_22-42-19_168.jpg
    11.2 KB · Views: 480
more photos, I hope somebody can tell me what it is.
 

Attachments

  • 2013-02-03_22-42-40_296.jpg
    2013-02-03_22-42-40_296.jpg
    6.6 KB · Views: 506
  • 2013-02-03_22-42-48_569.jpg
    2013-02-03_22-42-48_569.jpg
    5.4 KB · Views: 484
My guess is that it was man-made. "Iron meteorites" usually contain a lot of nickel (5% to 25%). Your analysis doesn't mention nickel at all.

Also, a meteorite would have a lot of surface damage from the heat generated as it fell through the atmosphere. Your object does not.
 
Yes, lack of nickel is not suggesting a sideral iron but IUPAC reports even less 1% of Ni in some meteorites.
May be an x-ray shot can tell about homogenity.
 
Are there any old iron foundries near where you found it?

I have seen similar looking "stones" near Meramec Spring Missouri, USA, which was the site of an early ironworks. A geologist friend told me they were slag from the open hearth furnaces. They were smooth and black like yours but flatter.

BUt don't take me as any sort of informed source.
 
basically I think it is man-made.

I never hear there is a foundry there though my friends already remind me. I think it is from a mechanical part, It droped to the earth, possible in river, then after wear and tear by sand, then it becomes to the shape. i pick it on the ground , maybe hill. I can not remember clearly becasue many years. it must not be near river.

the iron is rather hard, must harder than common steel. I used the very sharp point of the saw to scratch its surface. , it only can be remain mark, it can not make obvious pits on it.

I test the compositions at several positions, they do not change much.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top