N-D spring-mass damper total energy

ashapi
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I am trying to derive the total energy for an n-dimensional linear (Hookeian) spring-mass damper system and show that the total energy is either decreasing or constant.

Homework Equations


1D spring-mass damper equation
n-D spring-mass damper equation

The Attempt at a Solution



I started with the following force equation in 1D to describe the system:

(1) m\ddot{x} + b\dot{x} + kx = 0

Where:
m\ddot{x} = Facc = m\frac{d^{2}x}{dt^{2}}
b\dot{x} = Fdamp (viscous friction) = C\frac{dx}{dt}
kx = Fpotential (gradient of some potential) = \nablaP(x)

So the equation becomes:

(2) -\nablaP(x) - C\frac{dx}{dt} = m\frac{d^{2}x}{dt^{2}}

I then modeled the total energy as follows:

(3) Etot = P(x) + \frac{1}{2}m\dot{x}2

and

(4) \frac{dE}{dt}= \nablaP(x)\dot{x} + m\dot{x}\ddot{x}

In (4) I substituted m\ddot{x} from (1) and got:

\frac{dE}{dt}= \nablaP(x)\dot{x} + \dot{x}(-\nablaP(x) - C\dot{x})

=> -C\dot{x}2

...which shows that total energy is either decreasing (|\dot{x}| > 0) or constant (\dot{x} = 0)

I then tried to derive the total energy for the n-dimensional case and relate it to an n-D force equation as I did above. To do this I looked at the 2D case and then generalized the formulas for kinetic and potential energy to n-D but I'm not sure if this was correct. Here are my kinetic and potential energy equations for 2D:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My latex seems to bug out sometimes so if it looks weird please click on the source but let me continue...

KEtot,2D = \frac{1}{2}(m11\dot{x}12 + m22\dot{x}22 + m12\dot{x}1\dot{x}2)PEtot = \frac{1}{2}(m11{x}12 + m22{x}22 + m12{x}1{x}2)

I took the generalized forms to be:

KEtot,nD = \sum_{i=1}^{n} (mii)\dot{x}i2 + \sum_{j=1}^{n-1} \sum_{k=j+1}^n (mjk)\dot{x}j\dot{x}k

...and the same for PE with {x} replacing \dot{x}.

My plan was to take the derivatives of these and replace the m\ddot{x} terms with the force equivalences (as above). Is this right? I also can't think of how to make a generalized form of the force equation for an n-D vector.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,

ashapi
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top