Nanosecond Max Current of Residual-Current Circuit Breaker

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of using the Protective Earth (PE) wire in a residential electrical system to discharge an electromagnetic pulse (EMP) from a nuclear event. Concerns are raised about the potential damage to the residual-current circuit breaker (RCCB) due to high current discharges, specifically questioning the maximum current tolerance of a 16 Ampere RCCB during a nanosecond event. Participants debate the differences between lightning strikes and EMPs, emphasizing that EMPs can affect electronics directly, regardless of whether they are plugged in. The conversation concludes with a note that the original poster appears uninterested in the responses provided. The thread ultimately ends without resolution on the initial query.
consuli
Messages
62
Reaction score
4
<<Moderator note: Political statement removed.>>

To protect against a nuclear EMP (NEMP) usually a big metal box is used, which is electrically connected to earth, to discharge the electrical pulse.

Most houses in europe have a 3-grid electric system, L, Neutral (N) and Protective Earth (PE).

Is it possible to use the PE wire as EMP discharge to ground?

Please keep in mind, that the PE does not go to Earth directly, but has to pass the residual-current circuit breaker (RCCB), which may be damaged by the nano-second long high current discharge.

Conclusively, what is the 50 nano-second maximum current of a residual-current circuit breaker (RCCB), which has a permanent maximum current of 16 Ampere?

Consuli
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
I don't think any of that matters because EMP reaches your electronics directly, even if it is not plugged into the wall.

My boat was hit by lightning. The EMP destroyed almost all my electronics, even things that were turned off and even a hand-held walkie-talkie radio.
 
  • Like
Likes Fisherman199
<<Moderator note: off topic comments removed.>>

@ anorlunda
Lightning and EMP are totally different things ...

Consuli
 
Last edited by a moderator:
consuli said:
Lightning and EMP are totally different things

No. You need to learn some basic electricity including Maxwell's Equations.

Near (not in) a lightning strike, there is an EMP having a range of a few meters. The EMP from a nuclear explosion is similar but its range is hundreds of km.

You can get started by reading this
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_pulse
 
  • Like
Likes Fisherman199 and berkeman
If EMP protection is a military secret and following you cannot discuss it, please just say that and do not constantly remove comments.

Thanks
Cosuli
 
The OP does not seem to be interested in the answers to his question.

Thread closed.
 
  • Like
Likes jim hardy, Fisherman199 and Averagesupernova
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top