Nasty Integral - Help with Trig Substitution

mrworf
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


<br /> \int_{-p}^{p} \frac{2p}{(1+v^2)\sqrt{p^2 + v^2 +1 }} dv<br />


Homework Equations


1 + \tan{\theta}^2 = \sec{\theta}^2

The Attempt at a Solution


I thought the best way to go about this was to rename some constants.
Let \alpha^2 = 1 + p^2 so that we are left with:
<br /> \int_{-p}^{p} \frac{2p}{(1+v^2)\sqrt{\alpha^2+ v^2 }} dv<br />

i then make the variable substitution:
v = \alpha \tan{\theta}
dv = \alpha \sec{\theta}^2 d\theta

we now have:
<br /> 2p \int_{-p}^{p} \frac{1}{(1+\alpha^2 \tan^2{\theta})\sqrt{\alpha^2(1+\tan^2{\theta} )}} \alpha \sec{\theta}^2 d\theta<br />

<br /> 2p \int_{-p}^{p} \frac{1}{(1+\alpha^2 \tan^2{\theta})\alpha \sec{\theta}} \alpha \sec{\theta}^2 d\theta<br />

<br /> 2p \int_{-p}^{p} \frac{ \sec{\theta}}{(1+\alpha^2 \tan^2{\theta})} d\theta<br />

at this point i hit a roadblock - the (1 - \alpha \tan{\theta} ) term seems to be an inextricable pain . other substitutions leave me with a similar problem.
If anyone can point me in the direction of a better trig substitution, or perhaps an identity then your help would be greatly appreciated.
thanks for reading
-mrworf
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mrworf said:

Homework Statement


\int_{-p}^{p} \frac{2p}{(1+v^2)\sqrt{p^2 + v^2 +1 }} dv

Homework Equations


1 + \tan{\theta}^2 = \sec{\theta}^2

The Attempt at a Solution


I thought the best way to go about this was to rename some constants.
Let \alpha^2 = 1 + p^2 so that we are left with:<br /> \int_{-p}^{p} \frac{2p}{(1+v^2)\sqrt{\alpha^2+ v^2 }} dv

i then make the variable substitution:
v = \alpha \tan{\theta}
dv = \alpha \sec{\theta}^2 d\theta

we now have:
2p \int_{-p}^{p} \frac{1}{(1+\alpha^2 \tan^2{\theta})\sqrt{\alpha^2(1+\tan^2{\theta} )}} \alpha \sec{\theta}^2 d\theta

2p \int_{-p}^{p} \frac{1}{(1+\alpha^2 \tan^2{\theta})\alpha \sec{\theta}} \alpha \sec{\theta}^2 d\theta

2p \int_{-p}^{p} \frac{ \sec{\theta}}{(1+\alpha^2 \tan^2{\theta})} d\theta

at this point i hit a roadblock - the (1 - \alpha \tan{\theta} ) term seems to be an inextricable pain . other substitutions leave me with a similar problem.
If anyone can point me in the direction of a better trig substitution, or perhaps an identity then your help would be greatly appreciated.
thanks for reading
-mrworf
Hello mrworf. Welcome to PF !

First of all, \ \sec\theta^2\ means \ \sec(\theta^2)\,\ whereas \ \sec^2\theta\ means \ (\sec\theta)^2\ .\ I'm sure you want the latter for this problem.

Also, you need to change the limits of integration to reflect the substitution you did.
 
right on, with sammyS' suggestion, my equation becomes:

2 p \int_{\tan^{-1}{\frac{p}{\alpha}}}^{\tan^{-1}{\frac{-p}{\alpha}}} \bigg[ \frac{\sec{\theta}}{(1+\alpha^2 \tan^2{\theta})} \bigg] d\theta
 
mrworf said:
right on, with sammyS' suggestion, my equation becomes:

\displaystyle 2 p \int_{\tan^{-1}{\frac{p}{\alpha}}}^{\tan^{-1}{\frac{-p}{\alpha}}} \bigg[ \frac{\sec{\theta}}{(1+\alpha^2 \tan^2{\theta})} \bigg] d\theta
I admit, it's still quite nasty !
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top