Need help In Rotation Questions Please

  • Thread starter Thread starter brainracked
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rotation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the rotational inertia of a system consisting of two particles connected by a rigid rod. Participants clarify the use of the formula I = Icom + mh², emphasizing the need to apply it correctly for each mass. The confusion primarily revolves around why only m2 is used in certain parts of the equation and how to expand the terms properly. Ultimately, the correct approach involves calculating the inertia for each mass separately and then summing them to arrive at the final answer. The conversation concludes with a clearer understanding of the method and appreciation for the assistance provided.
brainracked
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A system consists of two particles, of masses m1 and m2, is connected by a light rigid rod of length L.
a) Find the rotational inertia I of system for rotations of tis object about an axis perpendicular to the rod and distance x from m1
b) Show that I is a minimum when x=xcm

Homework Equations


I= Icom + mh2
I= 1/12 mr2

The Attempt at a Solution


The answer provided was given as: I2=(m1+m2)x2+m2L2-2m2xL

I understand that it is juz applyin the formula I= Icom + mh2 but wat i do not understand is that

The thing that I don't understand is the mh^2 part..why is only m2 used in the equation?
And why when h= (L-x)^2 is expanded..what happens to the m2x^2?

And wat about the part b? By juz replacing the value it wif x...it juz doesn't make any sense...

Thanks ya..any help will be very much appreciated..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi brainracked! Welcome to PF! smile:
brainracked said:
The answer provided was given as: I2=(m1+m2)x2+m2L2-2m2xL

I understand that it is juz applyin the formula I= Icom + mh2

No, it isn't.

It's using the far simpler method of just using the basic formula for a point mass, I = mr2.

Try that! :smile:
 
Oh gosh.. -blush-
Dat simple?
Aiyo..I always complicate stuff...but..I still don't quite get it..haha..sorry ya..
So..okay..tryin out d simpler way..i get d 1st part which is I=(m1+m2)x^2 but wat about the rest of the answer where there is the +m2L^2 - 2m2xL?

And besides..i thought if it is not rotated about a central axis but at sum distance from it, the formula of I = Icom +mh^2 should b used as h comes into play as there is the mention of distance x from m1..

I can solve other problems similar to tis one but wif the numbers & figures given such as mass and distance and rev...but i juz can't seem to get my head round tis..

So sorry but I think I still need help in gettin tis rite.. =)
 
brainracked said:
Oh gosh.. -blush-
Dat simple?
Aiyo..I always complicate stuff...but..I still don't quite get it.

ok, let's do the easy one …

I for m1 is momentum x distance, = m1x2.

So I for m2 is … ? :smile:
 
Haha..ok..so m2 should b...m2L^2? Correct?
So the -2m2xL?
 
No that is still incorrect. Do you even understand how tiny-tim gave you the answer for the inertia of m_1? If so, then do the same for m_2 and then add their inertia's together and you will indeed arrive at the answer provided.
 
At first I don't think I fully understood..but now I get it..

Im1=m1x2

So..Im2 should b..

Im2=m2 (L-x)2
= m2 (L2+ x2 - 2xL)

Then as u said..by adding the Inertia's together..tadaa..the answer..Haha..

Big thank you to tiny-tim & chislam! :smile:
Take care you ppl!
 
Back
Top