Need some clarification on conducting spheres

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the electrostatic interaction between two identical conducting spheres that initially attract each other with a force of 0.141 N and later repel with a force of 0.0528 N after being connected by a wire. The confusion arises regarding the use of negative and positive signs in Coulomb's law, specifically why the attractive force is represented as negative and the repulsive force as positive. It is clarified that the negative sign indicates the direction of the force vector, with attraction pulling the spheres together, while repulsion pushes them apart. The explanation emphasizes that the signs of the charges can be neglected when focusing on the magnitude of the forces. Understanding the vector nature of forces resolves the initial confusion about the signs in the calculations.
RandellK02
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Question:
Two identical conducting spheres, fixed in place, attract each other with an electrostatic force of 0.141 N when their center-to-center separation is 67.0 cm. The spheres are then connected by a thin conducting wire. When the wire is removed, the spheres repel each other with an electrostatic force of 0.0528 N. Of the initial charges on the spheres, with a positive net charge, what was (a) the negative charge in coulombs on one of them and (b) the positive charge in coulombs on the other?

I got the right answer, however I am confused on one of the first steps.
I say q1 will be positive and q2 will be negative and Columbs law is set like this:
Code:
F=-(k*q1*q2)/r[SUP]2[/SUP]

My question is why is this negative and for qfinal it is positive when setting up Columbs law.
I hope I was clear enough in this question.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If I have understood your question correctly, you are wondering why the force is 'negative' when the two spheres are attracting, and 'positive' when they are repelling each other.

What you need to remember is that the force is a vector, and as a result, it has a direction. You have essentially calculated the force experienced by the 'right hand' sphere. Because it is being attracted to the 'left hand' sphere, it feels a force in the '-x' direction, hence the minus sign. There is another term in this formula called the 'unit vector', which dictates which direction the force points, but you don't really need to worry about it; without it, you can neglect the signs of the charges, since you are only interested in finding the magnitude of the force.
 
davo789 said:
If I have understood your question correctly, you are wondering why the force is 'negative' when the two spheres are attracting, and 'positive' when they are repelling each other.

What you need to remember is that the force is a vector, and as a result, it has a direction. You have essentially calculated the force experienced by the 'right hand' sphere. Because it is being attracted to the 'left hand' sphere, it feels a force in the '-x' direction, hence the minus sign. There is another term in this formula called the 'unit vector', which dictates which direction the force points, but you don't really need to worry about it; without it, you can neglect the signs of the charges, since you are only interested in finding the magnitude of the force.

Ok I see now, thanks for the reply and sorry if I wasnt clear.
 
Glad I could help! :)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top