Negative zero error in vernier calipers

AI Thread Summary
The vernier scale is typically read from the left when it slides to the right along the main scale. For negative zero error, the reading should indicate how far the vernier's zero is to the left of the main scale's zero. In this case, the correct negative reading can be determined by aligning the vernier scale with the main scale from the right. The discussion emphasizes the importance of visual alignment and suggests consulting a real vernier scale for clarity. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurate measurements with vernier calipers.
quietrain
Messages
648
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


vernier_readings.JPG



Hi, with regards to the negative zero error , do we read the vernier scale from the left or from the right?

In this case, should it be -0.04cm or -0.06cm?

Thank you !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The vernier scale is normally read from the left. That is when it is slid to the right along the main scale.
Look at A. You will see that first the 0.01 mark will align then the 0.02 one ... if the vernier is slit towards the right,
as it is for normal measurements. But for C is is to the left of the zero on the main scale. That is is has slid a certain
distance to the left of the 0 on the main scale. Now again look at A. The drawing is not completely correct in this case.
The 0 on the right of the vernier should be aligned with the 9 mm mark on the main scale and the next vernier
on the left should be slightly in front of the 8 mm mark, that is slightly to its right - maybe look at a real vernier scale if
possible - the other vernier lines are more or less in their correct positions with respect to the millimeer markings on
the main scale. So if you slide the vernier to the left from this point on the first one that will come into alignment is the
0.09 line then the 0.08 one ... so for negative readings you will get how far the 0 of the vernier is to the left of the 0 on
the main scale by reading it from the right.
 
andrevdh said:
The vernier scale is normally read from the left. That is when it is slid to the right along the main scale.
Look at A. You will see that first the 0.01 mark will align then the 0.02 one ... if the vernier is slit towards the right,
as it is for normal measurements. But for C is is to the left of the zero on the main scale. That is is has slid a certain
distance to the left of the 0 on the main scale. Now again look at A. The drawing is not completely correct in this case.
The 0 on the right of the vernier should be aligned with the 9 mm mark on the main scale and the next vernier
on the left should be slightly in front of the 8 mm mark, that is slightly to its right - maybe look at a real vernier scale if
possible - the other vernier lines are more or less in their correct positions with respect to the millimeer markings on
the main scale. So if you slide the vernier to the left from this point on the first one that will come into alignment is the
0.09 line then the 0.08 one ... so for negative readings you will get how far the 0 of the vernier is to the left of the 0 on
the main scale by reading it from the right.

i see , thank you for your explanation.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top