Net current in a solenoid or torroid

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the concept of net current in a toroid or solenoid, emphasizing that while the same current flows through each loop, the net current is calculated as 'n.i', where 'n' is the number of turns. This approach contrasts with a straight wire, where the net current is simply 'i'. The reasoning lies in the definition of current as the charge flowing across a surface per unit time, which can be adjusted based on the surface chosen. When considering a surface crossed by multiple wires, the total current becomes 'nI', reflecting the cumulative effect of the loops. Understanding this distinction is crucial for accurately applying current calculations in different geometries.
paulina
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
The notion of multiplying the current in each loop in a toroid or solenoid with the total number of loops in order to find out the net current in the toroid or solenoid is appearing a bit confusing.
Why do we do this when we know the same current is flowing through each loop (just like water flowing in a pipe)?
When the wire is a straight conducting wire we take the net current as ' i ' but in toroid or solenoid it is
' n.i ' where n is the number of turns of the coil. What is the cause for this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Current is the amount of charge that flows across a defined surface in a unit time. Generally, you take the surface to be the cross section of the wire, but you can choose a different surfsce. Sometimes, the surface of interest is one crossed by n wires each carrying a current of I. The charge crossing such a surface in a unit time is nI, so the current through that surface is n times the current through the wire.
 
DaleSpam said:
.
thanks for the explanation...
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top