Net flux through a closed sphere

AI Thread Summary
The net electrical flux through a closed sphere in a uniform electric field is zero because there is no charge enclosed within the sphere. This can be mathematically demonstrated using the first half of Gauss's Law, which states that the total electric flux through a closed surface is proportional to the charge enclosed. By visualizing the sphere with an axis aligned to the electric field and integrating the flux over area elements, particularly in a hemisphere, one can show that the contributions cancel out. The discussion confirms that this proof can be accomplished using single-variable calculus. Thus, the net flux through the closed sphere is indeed zero.
PeteyCoco
Messages
37
Reaction score
1
Find the net electrical flux through a closed sphere of radius R in a uniform electric field

I know that the flux is going to be 0 since there is no charge enclosed, but how would I show this mathematically? The next half of the question asks about a cylinder with sides parallel to the electric field, which I can prove is 0 easily, but I'm not sure if I know the math to prove the first scenario. Can the sphere-problem be proven with only knowledge of Single-Variable calc?

EDIT: I guess I'm asking if this can be proven easily using the first half of Gauss's Law, ignoring (Q-internal)/(epsilon-nought)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, it can be done with a single-variable integral.

You can visualize that the sphere has an "axis" aligned with the electric field. For area elements, take rings that are centered on that axis, something like this:
images?q=tbn:ANd9GcScKzbiYeomeocc55pBJpWhmYUKtXiqEEj4w3nIbxwtelBZndR1.png
Integrate the flux over all the area elements in a hemisphere, and you'll get that hemisphere's contribution to the total flux.

Hope that's clear enough.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top