New 25-Mile Radius Wireless Network - Is It Real?

AI Thread Summary
A new type of wireless network is reportedly emerging, capable of providing hotspots with a 25-mile radius. This technology raises concerns about Wi-Fi security, particularly regarding unauthorized access due to the expansive coverage area. Users are advised to implement strong security measures, such as changing default passwords and enabling MAC address filtering, although MAC addresses can be spoofed. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using WPA security protocols over outdated WEP, with recommendations for passphrases longer than 20 characters to deter attacks. While a 256-bit PSK is ideal, a 128-bit key is considered sufficient against current threats. The conversation also touches on the practicality of this technology for home use and its potential pricing, although specific details remain unclear.
aychamo
Messages
375
Reaction score
0
I hear there is a new type of wireless network coming out, allowing 25 mile radius hotspots? Is this true??

I mean, I'd love to buy a 25 mile radius router for my cable modem. I could use my **** at school!
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
Wi-Fi security

You might have security issues, with a 25 mile hotspot radius.
 
If I had my router with a changed default password, and with MAC address filtering on, how could they get into my network?
 
Inherhent unsecurity of Wi-Fi

MAC addresses are supposed to be unique, but you can change the one on a given device to whatever you like http://home.jwu.edu/jwright/papers/wlan-mac-spoof.pdf by burning a new EEPROM chip.




If I had my router with a changed default password
You're using WPA, right (and not the out-of-date WEP)? The longer (than 20 characters), the better:



  • As the standard states, passphrases longer than 20 characters are needed to start deterring attacks. This is considerably longer than most people will be willing to use.

    This offline attack should be easier to execute than the WEP attacks.


    Using Random values for the PSK

    The PSK MAY be a 256-bit (64 hexadecimal) random number. This is a large number for human entry; 20 character passphrases are considered too long for entry. Given the nature of the attack against the 4-Way Handshake, a PSK with only 128 bits of security is really sufficient, and in fact against current brute-strength attacks, 96 bits SHOULD be adequate. This is still larger than a large passphrase, but is unlikely to be in a dictionary attack. Using a relatively small random value represented in hexadecimal, and entering it as a passphrase will expand it to a proper 256-bit PSK.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Aye, but if a hacker is that determined to get 54mbs (or whatever unit) or 11mbs internet access, then so be it. I'd doubt any hacker would be so determined to gain access to my network that he'd burn an EEPROM. How would they get my MAC address anyway?

Regardless, what is the news on this technology? Is this WiFi-Max meant for home use? Price?
 
Big MAC snortack

aychamo said:
How would they get my MAC address anyway?
Sniff.




The message you have entered is too short. Please lengthen your message to at least 10 characters.[/color]
 
In my discussions elsewhere, I've noticed a lot of disagreement regarding AI. A question that comes up is, "Is AI hype?" Unfortunately, when this question is asked, the one asking, as far as I can tell, may mean one of three things which can lead to lots of confusion. I'll list them out now for clarity. 1. Can AI do everything a human can do and how close are we to that? 2. Are corporations and governments using the promise of AI to gain more power for themselves? 3. Are AI and transhumans...
Thread 'ChatGPT Examples, Good and Bad'
I've been experimenting with ChatGPT. Some results are good, some very very bad. I think examples can help expose the properties of this AI. Maybe you can post some of your favorite examples and tell us what they reveal about the properties of this AI. (I had problems with copy/paste of text and formatting, so I'm posting my examples as screen shots. That is a promising start. :smile: But then I provided values V=1, R1=1, R2=2, R3=3 and asked for the value of I. At first, it said...
Back
Top