New and upcoming ideas in nuclear engineering?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights emerging concepts in nuclear engineering, particularly the potential of pair production and quantum tunneling in fusion and fission processes. It emphasizes the need for new ideas to demonstrate practical advantages, such as cost-effectiveness, safety, and efficiency over existing technologies. Challenges in materials science, including high-temperature strength and corrosion resistance, are noted as critical areas for advancement. The conversation also points to the development of advanced reactors, like High Temperature Gas Reactors and molten salt reactors, as promising avenues for innovation. Overall, while there are ongoing challenges, the field is not stagnant and continues to evolve with new engineering solutions.
CherryTrooper
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
For example, what potential do interactions like pair production have in harnessing the idea of converting photons to mass have in the future of nuclear engineering? Or what about quantum tunneling as the basis of fusion/fission? is it getting cold in here, yet?

What are the new ideas out there? Or is nuke a stagnant art?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
New ideas in engineering have to justify their acceptance. They should ideally be cheaper to implement, as well as safer and more efficient than existing practice, but often just one big improvement is enough justification.
Please help us see the advantage(s) provided by the approaches you mention.
 
CherryTrooper said:
For example, what potential do interactions like pair production have in harnessing the idea of converting photons to mass have in the future of nuclear engineering? Or what about quantum tunneling as the basis of fusion/fission? is it getting cold in here, yet?
I don't see the practicality or utility of creating e-e+ pairs in large quantities. Other than high energy collisions, it takes ~1.022 MeV gamma rays to produce 1 pair, and then eventually the positron annihilates and one gets two 0.511 MeV gammas. One could produce positron emitters, but there appears no reasonable utility as an energy.

What are the new ideas out there? Or is nuke a stagnant art?
There are plenty of challenges in materials - high strength at temperature, maximal fracture toughness, corrosion resistance, fission product retention, . . . .

For fission systems, fission product disposition is a critical area.

GenIV systems are challenging.

Fusion still has to be perfected as a commercially viable energy source. Plasma stability is a challenge.

Finding a highly efficient thermal to electrical conversion system is a challenge.
 
CherryTrooper said:
For example, what potential do interactions like pair production have in harnessing the idea of converting photons to mass have in the future of nuclear engineering? Or what about quantum tunneling as the basis of fusion/fission? is it getting cold in here, yet?

What are the new ideas out there? Or is nuke a stagnant art?

There are always new ideas to be explored in nuclear engineering. The biggest area of opportunity is in developing reactors like the High Temperature Gas Reactor (HTGR) and the various types of molten salt (or liquid metal) reactors including both thermal and fast spectra. I believe you are looking for more physics problems to solve where as most current problems (in nuclear) are in the realm of material science, reactor physics, and fluids.
 
Hello, I'm currently trying to compare theoretical results with an MCNP simulation. I'm using two discrete sets of data, intensity (probability) and linear attenuation coefficient, both functions of energy, to produce an attenuated energy spectrum after x-rays have passed through a thin layer of lead. I've been running through the calculations and I'm getting a higher average attenuated energy (~74 keV) than initial average energy (~33 keV). My guess is I'm doing something wrong somewhere...
Back
Top