Newton Third Law general equation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving Newton's Third Law and the dynamics of two masses connected by a pulley system. The original poster seeks to derive an expression for the acceleration of one mass, assuming a frictionless table.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the forces acting on each mass, questioning the acceleration constraints between the two masses. There is an examination of the tension in the ropes and the relationship between the accelerations of the two masses.

Discussion Status

Participants have engaged in a back-and-forth dialogue, clarifying the forces involved and the relationships between the masses. Some guidance has been provided regarding the setup of equations and the acceleration constraints, leading to a proposed expression for acceleration.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on understanding the forces acting on the masses and the implications of the pulley system, with participants questioning the assumptions about acceleration and tension throughout the discussion.

bigredd87
Messages
12
Reaction score
1
I have a picture provided. You can assume that the table is frictionless. I need an expression for the acceleration of m1.
 

Attachments

  • knight_Figure_08_40.jpg
    knight_Figure_08_40.jpg
    5.2 KB · Views: 488
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
We don't do your homework for you. What are the forces on each mass?
 
here is what I have so far:

Fnetx for m1 is T=m1a
Fnety for m1 is N-m1g=0

I guess my real dilemma is i don't really know what the forces on m2 are. I believe there is no acceleration constraint since m2 is on the second pulley. Does that mean that the tension and weight are equal to m2a, with m2 having a different acceleration than m1?
 
bigredd87 said:
here is what I have so far:

Fnetx for m1 is T=m1a
Fnety for m1 is N-m1g=0
OK. (All you need here is Fnetx.)

I guess my real dilemma is i don't really know what the forces on m2 are.
Treat m2 and its pulley as one object. I see 3 forces acting on it.
I believe there is no acceleration constraint since m2 is on the second pulley.
Of course there is an acceleration constraint, which you need to figure out. When m2 drops X distance, how far must m1 move?

Does that mean that the tension and weight are equal to m2a, with m2 having a different acceleration than m1?
You will apply Newton's 2nd law to m2, just like to m1. Yes, a2 is different from a1, but there is a simple relationship.
 
so a2 =-a1? I didn't understand if the mass on the pulley made it different from other problems. So there is tension T from the rope attached to the wall, the weight force m2g, and the tension from m1 which is m1a1?
 
bigredd87 said:
so a2 =-a1?
No. (But the minus sign is good.) Answer my question earlier: When m2 drops X distance, how far must m1 move? (Get a piece of string and figure it out.)

I didn't understand if the mass on the pulley made it different from other problems. So there is tension T from the rope attached to the wall, the weight force m2g, and the tension from m1 which is m1a1?
The tension will be the same throughout the rope. The only things exerting a force on m2 are: (1) the ropes; (2) gravity.

Set up an equation for each mass. (After you've found the acceleration constraint.) Then solve them together to find the accelerations.
 
ok, so I think I got it now.

a2 = (-1/2)a1

so u have for m2 in y direction:
2T-m2g=m2a2 ; since there are two ropes pulling on m2

i already know that T =m1a1 and the acceleration constraint, so plugging this in i get:
2m1a1-m2g=-m2a1/2

4m1a1-2mg=-m2a1

a1(4m1 + m2)= 2mg

a1=2mg/(4m1+m2)
does this look ok?
 
Excellent!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
11K
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K