Newtons 2nd Law: F=ma Along x,y or z Direction

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the application of Newton's second law, F=ma, in different directions and the correct interpretation of forces acting on a body. A scenario is presented where two forces, 5 N and 3 N, act on a 2 kg body, resulting in a net force of -2 N, indicating acceleration to the left at -1 m/s². Confusion arises regarding the signs used in the equations, particularly whether to express the net force as 5-3 = -2a or 5-3 = 2a, with clarification that acceleration should align with the direction of the net force. Additionally, a problem involving two connected blocks is discussed, questioning the correct formulation of forces acting on the hanging block, highlighting the need for clarity in defining the direction of forces and acceleration. The conversation emphasizes the importance of vector direction in applying Newton's second law accurately.
sweet-buds
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


F=ma can be written as F=ma(along x, y or z-direction, )

when applying this equation along say horizontal x direction, the direction of acceleration needs to be taken as it is a vector.

i mean say 2 forces of 5 N and 3 N are applied on a 2 kg body that moves towards left as 5 N is applied towards left and 3N towards right. Now

According to me ,
5-3=2(-a)
= 2=-2a
=-1 m/s^2=a

this -1 indicates that accn is towards left.


I am confused with the idea should eqn be 5-3 = -2a or 5-3 =2a. i would go with the former one.




Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming right to be positive and left to be negative, and the set-up as such:

3 N ----> [2kg] <---- 5 N

Then we have F_net = m*a = 3 N + (-5 N) = - 2 N. You have a net force of 2 N in the negative direction (meaning it will be pushed to the left). Since -2 N = m*a and m = 2 kg, then we have -1 m/s^2. Since this is negative, once again, the body will accelerate to the left.

Does this make sense?
 
Last edited:
how is that possible? I would say since the 5N force is greater so the F_net=3-5
=-2 N, a force that act towards left. Now, -2=m*(-a)=>-2=2*(-a)=>1=a, as I pressume the body will move towards left due to net -2 N force and since acceleration is towards left, I have used a - ve sign before a.

My confusion arises in the second equation , F=ma where F is the net force acting on the body and let's say the force is in negative horizontal or vertical
direction, arent we suppose to assume the direction of acceleration also negative as acceleration is vector.
 
Ack! I am terribly sorry - I made a sign error when I added 3 and -5. You are correct! I edited the post with the necessary changes.
You are also correct when you say "he force is in negative horizontal or vertical
direction, arent we suppose to assume the direction of acceleration also negative as acceleration is vector."
 
help me urgent: Newton's 2nd law

You are also correct when you say "he force is in negative horizontal or vertical
direction, arent we suppose to assume the direction of acceleration also negative as acceleration is vector."[/QUOTE]

i got this problem in Haliday. There are 2 blocks connected by a rope. onr of the blocks is a sliding one and the other is a hanging one and the rope passes over a pulley and the pulley is connected at the edge of the table/surface. The sliding block moves towards the right and the hanging block down. Haliday has applied the Newtons second law to the two blocks.

The sliding block has mass M and hanging block a mass of m. haliday has said the the equation for hanging block is T-mg =-ma. i understand the fact that the hanging block is moving down in -ve y directio, that's why a istaken -ve here but doesn't that mean that mg>T for hanging block to move down. I mean shouldn't the equation be mg-T=-ma?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top