Newton's 3rd Law, pulley, only given friction coefficients

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving three connected masses, with specific attention to the friction coefficients affecting the acceleration of the system. The user is attempting to derive the acceleration of each mass but struggles due to the lack of mass values in their equations. Clarifications are needed regarding the frictional surfaces, particularly since m1 has two interfaces that could influence the outcome. The role of gravity and tension in the system is emphasized, as well as the need to consider the initial conditions and constraints of the problem. Clearer problem description and accurate representation of the forces involved are crucial for solving the equations effectively.
aatgomez
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An object consists of 3 connected masses as seen in the figure. None of the surfaces have friction except the surface on m1 which has the coefficients μs=0.4 y μk=0.3.
What is the acceleration of each one of the masses?
It looks like the following image but m1 is the table and m2 is equal to m3 or the block that's hanging from the pulley of the table.
nMkXx.png




Homework Equations


∑Fx = m1a → τ - fk = m1a
∑Fy = 0 → n- m1g = 0
T= μkm1g+ m1a
∑Fy = m2a → m2g - T =m2a
m2g - (μkm1g+m1a) = m2a
a = m2 - μkm1/m1 + m2



The Attempt at a Solution


I got up to the finally equation but I can't figure out how to solve the equation without mass. I've attached a picture just in case the problem needs some clearing up. Thanks! :smile:
 

Attachments

  • masses.jpg
    masses.jpg
    2.8 KB · Views: 544
Physics news on Phys.org
Please separate the work from the relevant equations.

The attached image is a bit confusing since it has two masses, m2, but one mentions a mass m3.

The falling mass is 'pulled' by gravity, so there must be 'g' in the final solution. Gravity is 'forcing' the system.

The small mass is pulled by the falling mass through tension in the cord or string.

Opposing the motion of the horizontally moving smaller mass is the friction with the table. If the table is free to slide, then it too will experience acceleration due to the frictional force sliding on top of it.

The accelerations will be related to g by some coefficient which will be a complicated function of the masses.
 
Is it safe to say that your first image is not relevant to this problem?

Are there any constraints on the problem? Are things starting from rest? Is the hanging mass falling? Is the system being accelerated?

Please revise your description of the problem to be clear about which surfaces have friction.
 
Particularly, one's needs to clarify "None of the surfaces have friction except the surface on m1 which has the coefficients μs=0.4 y μk=0.3." As shown in the attached diagram, m1 has two surfaces - between m1 and the ground, and between m1 and the mass on top. Friction on either of those surfaces, or both, will significantly affect the answer.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top