Newtons theory of gravity : satelite orbits and ellipses

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the calculation of the orbital period (T) for two planets of mass m orbiting a star of mass M in the same circular orbit with radius r. The user initially presents an equation but realizes it leads to an incorrect answer. They specifically seek assistance in identifying the error in their calculations. Clarification is requested regarding the figure referenced, which illustrates the orbital setup. The focus remains on deriving the correct formula for T based on Newton's theory of gravity and orbital mechanics.
marshall104
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
The figure shows two planets of mass m orbiting a star of mass M. The planets are in the same orbit, with radius r, but are always at opposite ends of a diameter.
This is the equation eq. I used:

mv^2/r=GMm/r^2+Gmm/(2r)^2

This is what I came up with but it is not the right answer. Where did I go wrong?

sqrt4pi^2/G(M+m)*r3/2

Any help would be great!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
marshall104 said:
The figure shows two planets of mass m orbiting a star of mass M. The planets are in the same orbit, with radius r, but are always at opposite ends of a diameter.
This is the equation eq. I used:

mv^2/r=GMm/r^2+Gmm/(2r)^2

This is what I came up with but it is not the right answer. Where did I go wrong?

sqrt4pi^2/G(M+m)*r3/2

Any help would be great!


What are you trying to find ?
 
marshall104 said:
The figure shows two planets of mass m orbiting a star of mass M.

What figure?

Zz.
 
I'm sorry. I'm trying to find T the orbital period
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top