Nodal Analysis of a Voltage Dependant voltage source, no pretty answer

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on the application of nodal analysis to a circuit containing a voltage-dependent voltage source and various resistors. The circuit includes a 50 Volt source, a 10 ohm resistor, a 30 ohm resistor, and dependent voltage source defined as V delta/5. The user utilized a TI-89 calculator to solve for the voltage 'v2', resulting in approximately 52.9412 Volts, leading to a V delta value of -2.9412 Volts. However, the user received feedback indicating that the results should yield integer values, suggesting a potential error in the setup of the equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Nodal analysis in electrical circuits
  • Understanding of Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL)
  • Basic circuit components: resistors and voltage sources
  • TI-89 calculator usage for solving equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the principles of Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL) in detail
  • Learn about dependent sources in electrical circuits
  • Practice solving nodal analysis problems with integer results
  • Explore advanced features of the TI-89 calculator for circuit analysis
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and anyone studying circuit analysis techniques, particularly those focusing on nodal analysis and dependent sources.

cybhunter
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




five branches

left most branch: 50 Volt source
second left most: 10 ohm resistor
shared branch between the second left most branch and center: 10 ohms (Voltage drop from left to right= V delta)

center branch: 30 ohm resistor

between center and second right most: dependent voltage source (V delta/ 5)
second right most branch: 39 ohms
right most branch: 78 ohms

the second and right most branch have an unknown voltage 'vo'


find the vo voltage


Homework Equations



due to KCL, the current entering the voltage dependent source must equal the current leaving the dependent source:

vo=v2-(V delta/5) and v delta= 50 volts - v2

equating the currents:

(v2-50 Volts)/(10 ohms) +(v2)/(30 ohms) =(v2-(50 volts -v2)/5)/(39 ohms) + (v2-(50 volts -v2)/5)/(78 ohms)

rearranging the equation to equate to zero amperes:

(v2-50 Volts)/(10 ohms) +(v2)/(30 ohms) -(v2-(50 volts -v2)/5)/(39 ohms) - (v2-(50 volts -v2)/5)/(78 ohms)= 0 Amperes

using a Ti-89 to slove this (using the above equation as 'n1' and the output as 'v2')
solve(n1,{v2}) results in v2 being equal to 900/17 volts (~52.9412 Volts) meaning a V delta value of -2.9412 volts.

Checking the currents, the left side of the dependent source (not including the current across the 10 ohm resistor) is equal to 2.0589 Amperes, and the right side is equal to 2.0583 Amperes. Considering the ugly numbers I ended up mentioning it to my professor and he note that since it is a textbook example, the numbers should be integers and that the answer I got is wrong.


The Attempt at a Solution



(see attached)


Considering that the currents are very very close, I can assume to an extant that I am setting up the equations properly. What am I missing though?
 

Attachments

  • Problem_7.jpg
    Problem_7.jpg
    32.9 KB · Views: 795
Physics news on Phys.org


cybhunter said:
due to KCL, the current entering the voltage dependent source must equal the current leaving the dependent source:

vo=v2-(V delta/5) and v delta= 50 volts - v2

equating the currents:

(v2-50 Volts)/(10 ohms) +(v2)/(30 ohms) =(v2-(50 volts -v2)/5)/(39 ohms) + (v2-(50 volts -v2)/5)/(78 ohms)
If you look carefully at the terms of your equation, each one describes a current flowing out of the supernode:
attachment.php?attachmentid=55967&stc=1&d=1361468306.gif

As such, when you wrote the terms on the RHS of the equals sign they should have taken the opposite sign so that they would represent currents flowing into the supernode. As it stands you've equated one set of currents flowing out of the supernode with another set of currents also flowing out.
 

Attachments

  • Fig1.gif
    Fig1.gif
    4 KB · Views: 1,000


Thanks
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K