Nodal Analysis Problem: Where Did I Go Wrong in Using the Superposition Method?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a nodal analysis problem where the user struggles with applying the superposition method correctly. They initially calculate the current and voltage at node B but arrive at incorrect values, leading to confusion about the influence of resistors and the current source. Clarifications are provided regarding the correct application of Kirchhoff's current law and the relationship between voltages at nodes A, B, and C, emphasizing that they are not all equal due to their connections. A sign error in the initial equations is identified, and it is noted that the current source is likely 3 mA instead of 3 A, which is crucial for accurate calculations. Ultimately, the user is guided to the correct voltage at node B, which is 4V, while addressing misconceptions about parallel and series connections.
terryds
Messages
392
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



1214gf6.png


The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
At node B,

##i_s + 3 = i_2##
## 3 + 3 = i_2##
##i_2 = 6A##
##V_2 = i_2/R_2 = 3V##

But, it seems that the answer is wrong. Using superposition method, the voltage is 4V
Please tell me where I got wrong
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't understand your node equation. Can you explain the terms in detail? The current source term is clear, it's a fixed 3 A source, but I don't see any influence from the resistor values.
 
gneill said:
I can't understand your node equation. Can you explain the terms in detail? The current source term is clear, it's a fixed 3 A fGsource, but I don't see any influence from the resistor values.

The resistor 2 kilo ohms is at the right. Of course, it doesn't influence the independent current source.

I label the three points at the top as A , B , and C. Forget about what Va means. Let's call it Vb since it is on the point B.

At the point B, the current which goes in are the current generated by Vs and ##R_1## and the independent current source. The current goes out from point B is ##I_2##.
So,
in=out
##Vs/R_1 + 3 A = I_2##
##3 V / 1 k ohms + 3 A = I_2##
##I_2 = 3 + 3 * 10^-3 A = 3.003 A##
##V_2 = 3.003 A * 2 * 10 ^ 3 = 6006 A##

Which seems a wrong answer... In the book which use the superposition method, the ##I_2## is 1 mA and the voltage ##V_2## is 4 V... Please help me where I got wrong
 
terryds said:
At the point B, the current which goes in are the current generated by Vs and ##R_1## and the independent current source. The current goes out from point B is ##I_2##.
So,
in=out
##Vs/R_1 + 3 A = I_2##
The source current is not VsR1. What is the potential difference across R1? Does it not depend on the potential of the node B?
 
ehild said:
The source current is not VsR1. What is the potential difference across R1? Does it not depend on the potential of the node B?

Hmm.. You're right..

##\frac{V_B-V_A}{R_1}+3=i_2##
##\frac{V_B-V_s}{R_1}+3=i_2##
##\frac{V_B-3}{1000}+3=i_2##
##V_B - 3 + 3000 = i_2##
##V_B - i_2 = -2997##
##V_B -\frac{V_2}{2000} = -2997##

I'm stuck here

How to relate ##V_2## and ##V_B## ?

If I'm not wrong, ##V_A## = ##V_B## = ##V_C## because they are parallel, right ?
And, ##V_C## is ##V_2##, so ##V_B## = ##V_2## ?

Am I wrong about this voltage equality ??
 
If I'm not wrong, ##V_A## = ##V_B## = ##V_C## because they are parallel, right ?
And, ##V_C## is ##V_2##, so ##V_B## = ##V_2## ?

Am I wrong about this voltage equality ??[/QUOTE]
No, that is right, VB=V2.
 
ehild said:
If I'm not wrong, ##V_A## = ##V_B## = ##V_C## because they are parallel, right ?
And, ##V_C## is ##V_2##, so ##V_B## = ##V_2## ?

Am I wrong about this voltage equality ??
No, that is right, VB=V2.

If it's right, then ##V_2 = V_B =V_A = V_S = 3 V ##?? But, the answer is 4V :cry:

However, by substituting ##V_2## = ##V_B##, I get
##V_B - \frac{V_B}{2000} = -2997##
##2000V_B-V_B = -5994000##
##1999V_B = -5994000##
##V_B = \frac{-5994000}{1999} = -2998.49##

which seems to be an impossible answer..
Please help me..
 
terryds said:
##\frac{V_B-V_A}{R_1}+3=i_2##
You have a sign error in the first line. You assumed the current flowing from left to right, that means it is (VA-VB)/R1. The current flows in the direction of decreasng potential.
I think the current is given in mA instead of A, it is 3 mA instead of 3 A.
 
  • Like
Likes terryds
You sure the ammeter is measuring 3 Amperes and not 3 milliamperes
 
  • #10
ehild said:
You have a sign error in the first line. You assumed the current flowing from left to right, that means it is (VA-VB)/R1. The current flows in the direction of decreasng potential.
I think the current is given in mA instead of A, it is 3 mA instead of 3 A.

##\frac{3-V_B}{1000} + 3 * 10^-3 = \frac{V_B}{2000}##
##3-V_B+3=\frac{V_B}{2}##
##V_B = 4 Volt##

Thanks for your help...

Anyway, you haven't answered my question :
If it's right, then V2=VB=VA=VS=3V?? But, the answer is 4V :cry:
Why ##V_B## is not equal to ##V_S## since it is parallel ??
 
  • #11
mpresic said:
You sure the ammeter is measuring 3 Amperes and not 3 milliamperes

Maybe it is an error in the book.. It should be 3 miliamps not 3 amps
 
  • #12
V2=VB, but not equal to VA. The source and the R2 resistors are not parallel. When are two elements connected in parallel?
 
  • #13
ehild said:
V2=VB, but not equal to VA. The source and the R2 resistors are not parallel. When are two elements connected in parallel?

I think ##V_S## and ##I_S## are in parallel. So, I think VA = VB..
I think two elements connected in parallel means that they are opposite direction..
But, Hmm...
So, the better definition is parallel-connection means that the currents are divided to sections, right ?
So, the voltage source is neither parallel to the current source (vertical line B) nor the R2 (vertical line C), right ?
 
  • #14
Parallel connection of two element means that both terminals of one of them is common with the other one.The voltage is the same across both elements.
Series connection means one common terminal, and nothing else is connected to that. The same current flows through both elements.
 
  • Like
Likes terryds

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top