Non-Ideal Op-Amp gain derivation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the derivation of gain for a non-ideal operational amplifier in a homework problem. Participants suggest using a matrix approach and math software to simplify calculations and avoid arithmetic errors. One contributor recommends substituting resistance values with conductance to streamline the equations. Discrepancies in calculated gain values are highlighted, with one user reporting a gain of 10^6, while another consistently finds -99.9889. A final correction is proposed to adjust the numerator for accurate gain calculation.
gfd43tg
Gold Member
Messages
947
Reaction score
48

Homework Statement


Problem statement is in the attachment HW 5, it is problem #1.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I am just stuck with a whole bunch of variables and this just looks like a complete mess
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
The best and the easiest way to solve this circuit is to use a matrix. And then use the math software and allow the computer to solve the matrix for us.
See the example
 

Attachments

Your equations look right.

I have 2 suggestions:
1. Instead of R, use G=1/R for all resistances. Makes the math look cleaner by eliminating fractions in your two basic equations.
2. Put your basic equations into math software. Don't try to solve them yourself; you are liable to make a mistake.
 
I'm plugging in the numbers in your equation Jony, and my gain is many orders of magnitude greater than Rf/Rs.

I get -10^24 for the top part of the franction, then 10^16 on the bottom part, giving 10^6 as the gain. The gain for the ideal is 100.
 
Last edited:
Maylis said:
I'm plugging in the numbers in your equation Jony, and my gain is many orders of magnitude greater than Rf/Rs.

I get -10^24 for the top part of the franction, then 10^16 on the bottom part, giving 10^6 as the gain. The gain for the ideal is 100.

You must have made an error in your arithmetic. I get -99.9889 for the gain.
 
I do it over and over and get the same result, are you getting -9.99999E+24 on the top of the fraction, and 1.000E+17 on the bottom?
 
Here's the result I get:

attachment.php?attachmentid=67305&stc=1&d=1394099970.png
 

Attachments

  • Values.png
    Values.png
    6.8 KB · Views: 475
Maylis said:
I'm plugging in the numbers in your equation Jony, and my gain is many orders of magnitude greater than Rf/Rs.

I get -10^24 for the top part of the franction, then 10^16 on the bottom part, giving 10^6 as the gain. The gain for the ideal is 100.

Because I made a stupid mistake not in the matrix but in input 5. The gain is A times larger than is should. To correct this simply remove the first A in numerator

correct numerator = Ri RL (-A Rf+Ro) = Ri RL (Ro - Rf A)

Sorry for confusion.
 
Back
Top