Nonconservative work while swimming

  • Thread starter Thread starter flemj
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Swimming Work
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the nonconservative work done by water on an athlete swimming in a pool. The athlete starts at rest and reaches a speed of 1.15 m/s after performing 171 J of work. Participants clarify that the correct energy conservation equation should include both potential and kinetic energy, leading to the work-energy theorem. The conversation emphasizes understanding the physics behind energy transformation, including the loss of energy due to friction and heat. The need to determine the distance swum to accurately calculate energy loss is also highlighted.
flemj
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




Starting at rest at the edge of a swimming pool, a 67.0 athlete swims along the surface of the water and reaches a speed of 1.15 by doing the work = 171 . Find the nonconservative work, , done by the water on the athlete.

Homework Equations



(m)(a)(x initial) + .5 (m)(v^2 initial) = (m)(a)(x final) + .5 (m)(v^2 final)
E=UK
W=Fd
F=ma
K=.5 mv^2

The Attempt at a Solution



Im not really sure how to tackle this problem those are the equations i think i need to use but should it go something like

K=.5(67kg)(1.15m/s^2) so K=44.3
E=UK (U being the work?) E= (171)(44.3) E=7575.3

i don't know what I am doing i need some help that'd be great
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
flemj said:
E=UK

You have an error in your equation: E=UK. It would normally be: E = U + K

The equation is meant to demonstration conservation of energy: Energy equals potential energy plus kinetic. U is typically potential energy, which is usually a conservative form of energy because potential is gravitational or electrical potential energy... or maybe elastic potential too (in frictionless springs).

What you really want is something called the "work-energy theorem"... and even better form of conservation of energy, because now you could put work in (ex. chemical reactions like those in your own body converting chemical energy, or energy in the form of electrical bond in chemicals, to usable forms) or take work out (ex. lost of energy to heat (kinetic energy in microscopic particles like molecules or atoms).. look up that.
 
sorry i wrote that down wrong but your saying i want to use W=Delta Ek ? how do i go about that tho? by using K=.5 mv^2?
 
flemj said:
sorry i wrote that down wrong but your saying i want to use W=Delta Ek ? how do i go about that tho? by using K=.5 mv^2?

Think again about the physics... NOT just equations!
You're swimming. You use some chemical energy to do that: how much?

Then: what do you get out of it?

Then: As the problem asks for: Did you get everything out of it that you could have if the situation worked perfect for you? If not: what did you lose in the process?
 
physics girl phd said:
Think again about the physics... NOT just equations!
You're swimming. You use some chemical energy to do that: how much?

Then: what do you get out of it?

Then: As the problem asks for: Did you get everything out of it that you could have if the situation worked perfect for you? If not: what did you lose in the process?

yes so while swimming my conservative energy would be 77.05 and in a nonconservative force I am losing some of that energy due to the friction and the heat that I am giving off etc. to solve for this equation do i need to find the distance i have swam ? i understand why it happened just now how to calculate the lose
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top