Normal Modes Solution for Two-Body Oscillator

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion on the normal modes solution for a coupled two-body oscillator, the general solution is presented with equations for x1(t) and x2(t), incorporating constants C1-, C1+, ψ-, and ψ+. The inquiry focuses on why ψ2- cannot be expressed as a function of ψ1- and other constants to maintain a "pure," in-phase normal mode solution. The question suggests a need for clarity on the relationship between these variables in the context of normal modes. Participants are encouraged to provide insights or explanations regarding this aspect of coupled oscillators. The discussion highlights the complexity of determining the relationships between oscillation parameters in two-body systems.
Migdal
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello!

For a coupled two-body oscillator we write the general solution as:
x1(t)=C1-Cos[ω-t+ψ1-]+C1+Cos[ω+t+ψ1+]
x2(t)=C2-Cos[ω-t+ψ2-]+C2+Cos[ω+t+ψ2+]
Where we determine C1-/C2- and C1+/C2+ from the normal mode condition.

We call ψ1-2-- and ψ1+= ψ2++, and we end up with 4 adjustable constants: C1-,C1+, ψ-, ψ+.

Why is that? Why can't ψ2- be a function of ψ1-,( ψ1+ maybe), C1- and C1+, such that ψ2-(C1+=0)=ψ1-, in order to keep the "pure", in phase, normal mode solution? The same for ψ2+.

Thank you in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bump.

Can anybody give me any kind of answer? Maybe it's an inappropriate question.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top