Normalizing wave function, factor of 2 out

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 3K views
Frinkz
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider the wave function

[tex]\Psi(x, t) = Ae^{-\lambda|x|}e^{-i\omega t}[/tex]

where A, [tex]\lambda[/tex] and [tex]\omega[/tex] are positive real constants.

Normalize [tex]\Psi[/tex]

Homework Equations


[tex]\int |\Psi(x, t)|^{2} dx = 1[/tex]

[tex]|\Psi(x, t)|^{2} = \Psi^{*}\Psi[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


I have a model solution - with a step missing, I think my error is in complex conjugate math...

1, Finding [tex]|\Psi(x, t)|^{2}[/tex]

[tex]\Psi^{*}\Psi = (Ae^{-\lambda|x|}e^{i\omega t}) (Ae^{-\lambda|x|}e^{-i\omega t})[/tex]

[tex]= A^{2}e^{-2\lambda|x|}e^{i\omega t}e^{-i\omega t}[/tex]
[tex]= A^{2}e^{-2\lambda|x|}e^{0} = A^{2}e^{-2\lambda|x|}[/tex]

I think this is where my problem is, I am told that

[tex]|\Psi(x, t)|^{2} = 2|A|^{2}e^{-2\lambda|x|}[/tex]So I am missing a factor of 2?

Is there a complex conjugate rule somewhere I am missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
your steps looks fine to me, I am not sure from where they got the factor of 2?.. and there is no other complex conjugate rule you miss ..

is their answer says that psi^2 is after obtaining the normalized wavefunction? or is it just the step that follows the one you did ?..
 
Thanks for checking.


Turns out, the model answers were a bit badly written.


They had put in the factor of two, because the integral was changed from -infinity to +infinity, to 0 to +infinity, so you can make use of a definite integral

[tex]\int_0^{\infty} \! e^{-\lambda x} = \frac{1}{2}\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{\lambda}}[/tex]

That step was just omitted from the solution I was trying to understand, but I get it now :)
 
Sorry, that was a typo.

Should have been e^(-lambda x^2)