Normalizing wave function, factor of 2 out

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around normalizing the wave function Ψ(x, t) = Ae^{-\lambda|x|}e^{-i\omega t}. The key point is the calculation of the squared magnitude, where the user initially believes there is a missing factor of 2 in the expression for |\Psi(x, t)|^{2}. It is clarified that the factor of 2 arises from changing the limits of integration from -infinity to +infinity to 0 to +infinity, allowing the use of a definite integral. The model solution was poorly written, leading to confusion, but the user ultimately understands the normalization process. The discussion highlights the importance of careful consideration of integration limits in wave function normalization.
Frinkz
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider the wave function

\Psi(x, t) = Ae^{-\lambda|x|}e^{-i\omega t}

where A, \lambda and \omega are positive real constants.

Normalize \Psi

Homework Equations


\int |\Psi(x, t)|^{2} dx = 1

|\Psi(x, t)|^{2} = \Psi^{*}\Psi

The Attempt at a Solution


I have a model solution - with a step missing, I think my error is in complex conjugate math...

1, Finding |\Psi(x, t)|^{2}

\Psi^{*}\Psi = (Ae^{-\lambda|x|}e^{i\omega t}) (Ae^{-\lambda|x|}e^{-i\omega t})

= A^{2}e^{-2\lambda|x|}e^{i\omega t}e^{-i\omega t}
= A^{2}e^{-2\lambda|x|}e^{0} = A^{2}e^{-2\lambda|x|}

I think this is where my problem is, I am told that

|\Psi(x, t)|^{2} = 2|A|^{2}e^{-2\lambda|x|}So I am missing a factor of 2?

Is there a complex conjugate rule somewhere I am missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
your steps looks fine to me, I am not sure from where they got the factor of 2?.. and there is no other complex conjugate rule you miss ..

is their answer says that psi^2 is after obtaining the normalized wavefunction? or is it just the step that follows the one you did ?..
 
Thanks for checking.


Turns out, the model answers were a bit badly written.


They had put in the factor of two, because the integral was changed from -infinity to +infinity, to 0 to +infinity, so you can make use of a definite integral

\int_0^{\infty} \! e^{-\lambda x} = \frac{1}{2}\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{\lambda}}

That step was just omitted from the solution I was trying to understand, but I get it now :)
 
Sorry, that was a typo.

Should have been e^(-lambda x^2)
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top