Not intuitive-friction causes motion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter samtouchdown
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion
AI Thread Summary
Friction plays a crucial role in the acceleration of mass 2, which rests on mass 1 being pulled by a rope. While friction typically opposes motion, in this scenario, it allows mass 2 to accelerate along with mass 1, preventing it from falling off. The key is understanding that the acceleration is relative; mass 2 appears at rest on mass 1 but is accelerating with respect to the ground. This concept is similar to a person standing in a moving truck, where static friction is necessary to keep the load from sliding off. Ultimately, the net force acting on mass 2 is provided entirely by static friction, enabling it to move in sync with mass 1.
samtouchdown
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Not intuitive--friction causes motion?

Hi. I'm having difficulty conceptualizing this situation:

Consider two objects, mass 1 and mass 2. Mass 2 is on mass 1 and mass 1 is being pulled by a rope. There is a frictional force between mass 1 and mass 2, but none between mass 2 and the surface. Now my confusions/questions are as follows:

How is the acceleration of mass 2 caused by the frictional force between the two objects? It is known that friction retards motion, so how does this force supposedly help object 2 accelerate? It would be appreciated if you can help me visualize/provide intuition for this situation (how friction causes acceleration, that is).
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Imagine standing on the bed of a truck with an unsecured load, just as it starts to accelerate. What will happen to the load? Now think about what the looks like from the ground.

Mass 1 is the truck; mass 2 is the load. Does that help?
 


Ibix said:
Imagine standing on the bed of a truck with an unsecured load, just as it starts to accelerate. What will happen to the load? Now think about what the looks like from the ground.

Mass 1 is the truck; mass 2 is the load. Does that help?
Well, the unsecured load will fall off the truck. So, to keep the the object on the accelerating truck, we would need friction. So, the friction keeps the object "accelerating" with the truck. I think what's confusing me is how it is accelerating; specifically, it is at rest on the truck but with respect to the ground, it is accelerating. So, is the free body diagram and acceleration with respect to the ground or the truck itself? Thanks in advance.
 


Always with respect to the ground when using Newton 2 and free body diagrams with real forces.
 


This is more of a relative velocity question. As you said, with respect to the bottom mass, the top mass is not moving. The idea is the same as you driving inside a car. The car is moving, and with respect to the car, you are not moving. However, with respect to the ground the car is moving, so you must be moving, since you are moving at the same speed as the car. Similarly, because the bottom mass moves, the top mass must also move with respect to the ground. Of course, there is no net force technically being applied on the top mass, so the actual net force on it is solely provided by the static friction, not the kinetic friction. There is no external force on the top mass, so the net force is solely given by the static friction. That should answer your question.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top