Nuclear Engineering vs. Physics?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the decision between pursuing a degree in nuclear engineering or physics. The individual, a sophomore at a community college, is exploring options for baccalaureate programs, expressing a strong interest in both fields but leaning towards a career in industry rather than academia. They are considering a double major in applied mathematics and physics or enrolling in a top-ranked nuclear engineering program, which is known for its lucrative career prospects. Concerns about the time commitment for a double major are raised, as it could extend their education by five years. The advice given emphasizes the importance of evaluating course requirements for both fields and suggests that either path can lead to challenging yet rewarding careers. Ultimately, the decision hinges on which program offers better career options and prestige.
NukeEmAll
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Nuclear Engineering vs. Physics??

So I am a sophomore at a community college and will have to apply to baccalaureate programs soon for entrance in August 2010. I have always been interested in physics but have recently become more involved in engineering through the engineering society at school and talking with professional engineers; now I'm not really wanting to go into academia as a physics professor and I definitely want to do something in industry.

The only engineering physics undergraduate program available in the state has an aeronautics focus which I don't really want to go into; my other option is double-majoring in applied mathematics and physics at another school and studying engineering physics in graduate school.

I have also recently become interested in nuclear engineering, which is, I am told, a very lucrative profession. The only nuclear engineering program in the state has been ranked as top 10 in the nation. The advisors in that program told me that double-majoring in nuclear engineering and physics would take another five years in addition to the two years I've already spent at a community college, and I don't really want to have to spend seven years getting my baccalaureate education.

I already have my top choice of school for either option (physics or nuclear engineering), which is the same school that has the top 10 nuclear program. My question is...should I go into the nuclear engineering program at this school since it is one of the best in the nation or should I go into the physics program which isn't really ranked at all? I know I like both fields very much; I guess now it boils down to which one has the most options for careers. (and which has the better prestige)

Any advice would be appreciated :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org


One could do either, or both. I don't see why a double major in Physics and NE would require an additional 5 years beyond community college, but that may depend on where one is starting at CC.

I'd recommend taking the Physics and NE course requirements and seeing how they mesh together in three or four years.

Either program can be challenging.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top