Nuclear fission and nuclear to thermal energy conversion

AI Thread Summary
In a nuclear power plant, if the main water pipe breaks and control rods are deployed to stop the chain reaction, a significant issue remains due to ongoing thermal energy generation from radioactivity. The discussion highlights that even with the fission process halted, residual heat from radioactive decay can still pose a risk, contradicting the belief that no heat is produced once fission stops. The comparison to the Fukushima disaster illustrates the potential dangers of losing cooling systems, emphasizing the importance of understanding thermal energy management in nuclear safety. Ultimately, the consensus shifts towards recognizing that stopping the chain reaction does not eliminate the risk of overheating. The conversation concludes with an acknowledgment of the complexities involved in nuclear energy and safety protocols.
kirsten_2009
Messages
136
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


[/B]
Suppose the main water pipe breaks in a nuclear power plant, shutting off the water flow. If the control rods fall immediately into place, stopping the chain reaction, is there still a problem?

Yes, because radioactivity continues to create lots of thermal energy. (A)
Yes, because the control rods stop only the fissioning of uranium and not the fissioning of plutonium. (B)
Yes, because the uranium can still fission even though it is not chain-reacting. (C)
No, because no heat can be created once the fission reaction is shut off. (D)
No, because the small amount of heat that continues being created is not enough to cause any danger. (E)

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm thinking (D) -No, because no heat can be created once the fission reaction is shut off.

The fission of Uranium is what releases nuclear energy to heat water which then under less pressure turns into steam to turn a turbine no? but if the fission if uranium through it's chain reactions is stopped then there is no nuclear energy being released to heat the water averting a meltdown...correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ah interesting...thank you! so...although fission stops, still a lot of heat is produced by radioactivity so there is still definitely a problem. I choose (A).
 
you wouldn't happen to be in phy100 at u of t would you?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top