Nuclear Physics - mean-square charge radius of a uniformly charged sphere

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the mean-square charge radius of a uniformly charged sphere, with the goal of demonstrating that < r^2 > = 3*R^2 / 5. Participants clarify the need to correctly apply the equations related to charge distribution and normalization constants. The importance of using the correct potential equations for regions inside and outside the sphere is emphasized, alongside the need to avoid mixing concepts such as the Form factor with charge distribution. A participant expresses confusion about finding the normalization constant and the integration process, indicating a need for further clarification on mathematical integration in this context. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities involved in nuclear physics calculations and the necessity of a solid mathematical foundation.
wdednam
Messages
33
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Show that the mean-square charge radius of a uniformly charged sphere (with radius R) is
< r^2 > = 3*R^2 / 5

Homework Equations



< r^2 > = \int \varphif* r^2 \varphii dV

\varphif* = exp(-i q dot r)

\varphii = exp(i q dot r)

where q = kf - ki
and pf = h_bar * kf
pi = h_bar * ki

r > R: V(r) = -Ze^2 / (4*pi*e0) * 1/r^2
r < R: V´(r) = -Ze^2 / (4*pi*e0*R) * (3/2 - 1/2 * (r/R)^2)

Ei = 1/2*m*vi

Er0 = J0^2/(2*m*r0^2) + V(r0) or V´(r0) according as r > R or r < R.

J0 = Ji = m*vi*b

where b is the impact parameter and is b = Ze^2/ (4*pi*e0*m*vi^2) * cot(A/2) for hyperbolic orbits, Ei > 0

The Attempt at a Solution



I basically want to know if my approach is correct. I think that I have to find < r0^2 > where r0 is the distance of closest approach to the centre of the charge distribution either inside it (where the electron feels V´(r)) or outside it (where the electron feels V(r)).

I've done some calculations using the radial energy equation, trying to solve for r0^2, but the calculations are a mess and I get a feeling I'm going about it all wrong. The problem is from Krane's Introductory Nuclear Physics, Chapter 3, problem 3.1.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are mixing concepts here, you have tried to evaluate the Form factor, F, with the potential r^2 ..

you want to evaluate the mean square radius, then use formula for distributions:
1 = A\int \rho (\vec{r})d\vec{r}

this is from mathematical statistics. Now use that the distribution of charge is constant up radius R, and for radius larger than R it is zero. Angular integration gives you 4pi, so it is easy to find the normalization constant A.

Then you recall from statistics that the average value of some quantity Q is
&lt;Q&gt; = A\int Q\rho (\vec{r})d\vec{r}

Now you have what you need.
What you did wrong was to mix this up with the Form factor F.
 
Hi Malawi Glenn,

Thank you very much, I used the equations you suggested and got the required result.

I'm concurrently registered for Stat Mech, QM, Nuclear Physics and Solid State Phys this year and realized when I attempted this problem that I should have completed Stat Mech and QM before I took Nuc Phys and SS Phys, but what's done is done and I'll just have to cope.

Thanks again.
 
well yes, QM is pre requirement for both SS phys and Nuc phys. But the math behind is just probability, continuous and discrete.
 
I know it is too late but I have a question.

How could we find the normalization constant?

We have: ρ=3/(4.pi.R^3).

I know that we should also have A=4.pi, but the integration:

1= A ∫ρ dr

does not give that result. Any ideas?
 
up...
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top