Nuclear power plant at 34% efficiency - rising temperature of water

sabianbenz
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A nuclear power plant generates 500MW at 34 percent efficiency. The waste heat goes into the connecticut river with an average flow of 3x10 to the 4th kg/s. How much does the water temperature rise? (it requires 4.8x10 to the 3 to raise the temperature of 1kg of water 1K
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A 2-inch thick outer wall of a building has been constructed using 2-inch aluminum finishing nails. the nails hold together two identical 1-inch thick yellow-pine boards. Assume the following:

-k (aluminum nails) = 1390 BTU-in/ft. sqare - hr- degrees F
-K (yellow pine) = .o8 BTU-in/ft. squared - hr - degrees F
1% opf wall area is nails; 99% is yellow pine
-inside temperature = 65 degrees F (public building standard)
-Toledo outside Winter temperature = 30 degrees F (based on months of Dec-Mar. during 1931-1968; rounded to the nearest degree)
-convection is negligible.

Calculate the total (TU/hr-ft squared) through the wall. (Hint - use a total area of 1 sq. foot) According to a very recent study, 58% of the energy consumed in the home goes to space heating and 15% goes to hot water heating.
 
Any thoughts there??

You can't just post problems to be solved by other people. Give us an idea of what you are finding difficult about these problems and any ideas at all. Even if you just state the basic concept behind the problems.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top