Nullifying Lorentz Force on Proton Moving in Parallel Direction

AI Thread Summary
To nullify the Lorentz force on a proton moving parallel to the vector direction of i+k in a magnetic field of 1T, an appropriate electric field must be applied. The initial attempt to calculate the velocity vector as 3·10^5(i+k) led to an incorrect cross product result. A suggestion was made to represent the velocity using unit vectors, specifically by normalizing the direction vector to simplify calculations. This approach allows for easier manipulation of the vectors during the cross product operation. Ultimately, the correct representation and calculation of the electric field vector are crucial for achieving zero net force on the proton.
Celso
Messages
33
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A proton moves with a speed ##v = 3 \cdot 10^5 \frac{m}{s}## in the parallel direction to ##i+k##. A magnetic field of ##1T##, in the ##i+j+k## acts over it. Which electric field must we apply in this region so that the Lorentz force over the proton is null?

Homework Equations


##F = q(\vec{E} + \vec{v}\times\vec{B})##

The Attempt at a Solution


My first step (and the wrong one) was consider ##\vec{v} = 3\cdot10^5 (i+k)##, then I made the vectorial product ##\vec{v}\times\vec{B}## finding ##3\cdot10^5(-i+k)##, then I simply wanted to find the electric field vector such as ##\vec{E} + 3\cdot 10^5 (-i+k) = \vec{0} \rightarrow \vec{E} = 3\cdot 10^5(i-k)##

My doubt is: how do I represent the velocity vector in this case by knowing its size and which vector it is parallel to?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Celso said:

Homework Statement


A proton moves with a speed ##v = 3 \cdot 10^5 \frac{m}{s}## in the parallel direction to ##i+k##. A magnetic field of ##1T##, in the ##i+j+k## acts over it. Which electric field must we apply in this region so that the Lorentz force over the proton is null?

Homework Equations


##F = q(\vec{E} + \vec{v}\times\vec{B})##

The Attempt at a Solution


My first step (and the wrong one) was consider ##\vec{v} = 3\cdot10^5 (i+k)##, then I made the vectorial product ##\vec{v}\times\vec{B}## finding ##3\cdot10^5(-i+k)##, then I simply wanted to find the electric field vector such as ##\vec{E} + 3\cdot 10^5 (-i+k) = \vec{0} \rightarrow \vec{E} = 3\cdot 10^5(i-k)##

My doubt is: how do I represent the velocity vector in this case by knowing its size and which vector it is parallel to?
Maybe you should consider to make calculations with unit vectors. For example, the unit vector in ##i+k## direction would be ##(i+k)/\sqrt {2}## so now you can multiply it with ##v##. And you can do this for the magnetic field.
 
I find it convenient to represent such things as column vectors with unit values as entries. So in your case:

upload_2018-10-27_12-7-0.png


Then when it comes time to do the vector math, the cross product becomes trivial as the constants can all be "moved out of the way" leaving two very simple vectors to multiply.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-10-27_12-7-0.png
    upload_2018-10-27_12-7-0.png
    961 bytes · Views: 270
  • Like
Likes Celso
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top