Number density: Initial fluctuation strength and more....

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the "number density" formula presented by Steven Weinberg in his book "Cosmology," specifically equation (8.2.23). Participants seek clarification on parameters such as "initial fluctuation strength" and the time-independent quantity denoted as tilde{σ}_M. The initial fluctuation strength, defined as ρ_1= lim_{t → 0} (Δρ_M^3 / ρ̄_M^2), approaches 1 in a matter-dominated era. The conversation emphasizes the need for context and specific references to Weinberg's work for better understanding.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cosmological principles and the matter-dominated era.
  • Familiarity with Weinberg's "Cosmology" and its relevant equations.
  • Basic knowledge of fluctuation theory in cosmology.
  • Ability to interpret mathematical expressions related to density and scale factors.
NEXT STEPS
  • Review Weinberg's "Cosmology," focusing on equation (8.2.23) and its implications.
  • Explore the concept of initial fluctuation strength in cosmological models.
  • Investigate the physical significance of the time-independent quantity tilde{σ}_M.
  • Learn about the derivation and application of the number density formula in structure formation.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, cosmologists, and students studying structure formation in the universe, particularly those interested in the mathematical foundations of number density and fluctuation theory.

shadishacker
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Dear all,
I am trying to understand the physics behind the "number density" formula given by Weinberg.
Is there anyone who can explain these parameters to me:

1- "Initial fluctuation strength":
\begin{equation} \rho_1= \lim_{t \to 0}\frac{\Delta \rho_M^3}{\bar{\rho}^2_M}\end{equation}
However, as t goes to 0, one can say:
\begin{equation} \rho_1= \frac{a^{-6}}{(a^{-3})^2}=1\end{equation}
in which a is the scale factor. and of course both a and the density are functions of time.
This would be because initially, we are in the mater dominated era.
So why are we using this at all?! Isn't this equal to 1?2-the time independent quantity:
\begin{equation} \tilde{\sigma}_M\end{equation}
What does it mean physically? If I want to make some plots of n, Where can find a proper function of this?3-How about:
\begin{equation} \sigma_R\end{equation}
 
Space news on Phys.org
It would be helpful to have the context, and your reference is not very useful. Which book by Weinberg ("Gravitation and Cosmology" or "Cosmology"), and on which pages?
 
George Jones said:
It would be helpful to have the context, and your reference is not very useful. Which book by Weinberg ("Gravitation and Cosmology" or "Cosmology"), and on which pages?
Oh sorry! you are right!
The book is Cosmology and the formula is equation (8.2.23) :
\begin{equation}
n(M,t)=\frac{\rho_1^{1/3 } (t) \bar{\rho}_M(t)}{M\sqrt{2\pi}} |\frac{d\ \tilde{\sigma}^{-1}_R (M)}{dM}|\ exp(-\frac{\rho_1^{2/3}(t)}{2 \tilde{\sigma}_{R(M)}})
\end{equation}
which shows the number density of collapsed structure with mass between M and M+dM
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K