Number of States in a 1D Simple Harmonic Oscillator

Ang Han Wei
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A system is made of N 1D simple harmonic oscillators. Show that the number of states with total energy E is given by \Omega(E) = \frac{(M+N-1)!}{(M!)(N-1)!}


Homework Equations


Each particle has energy ε = \overline{h}\omega(n + \frac{1}{2}), n = 0, 1

Total energy is given by E = [\frac{N}{2} + M]\overline{h}\omega, M is an integer

The Attempt at a Solution



If the entire system is in the ground state, n = 0 for all particles and the energy will be \frac{N}{2}\overline{h}\omega

So M must be the number of excited particles having the value of n = 1

Hence, the total number of states should be the number of ways that I can choose M particles to be "excited" out of N particles.
\Omega = \frac{N!}{(M!)(N-M)!} but that is not the case.

I am not sure where I have gone wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your mistake is in assuming the excited oscillators have to be in the n=1 state. For example, say you had three oscillators. If two are in the n=1 state and one is in the n=0 state, the system has the same energy as one with one oscillator in the n=2 state and two oscillators in the n=0 state.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top