One Dimensional Motion Question

AI Thread Summary
The problem involves a pelican diving from a height of 18.0 meters to catch a fish, which takes 0.25 seconds to react. Using the equation for one-dimensional motion, the calculations indicate that the fish must spot the pelican at a minimum height of approximately 4.6 meters to escape. The initial attempts at solving the problem yielded answers around 4.0 to 4.7 meters, but discrepancies in significant figures and calculations led to confusion. The correct approach involves accounting for the time it takes the fish to react and the physics of free fall. Ultimately, the minimum height for the fish to see the pelican and escape is determined to be 4.6 meters.
Bahadar
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Pelicans tuck their wings and free-fall straight down when diving for fish. Suppose a pelican starts its dive from a height of 18.0m and cannot change its path once committed. If it takes a fish 0.25s to perform evasive action, at what minimum height must it spot the pelican to escape? Assume the fish is at the surface of the water. (Answer must be in 2 significant figures.)


Homework Equations


X=vot+1/2at^2


The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to go about solving this but it seems I am still getting the wrong answer.

x=vot+1/2at^2
18=(1/2)(9.81)t^2
18=4.9(t)^2
sqrt(3.7)=t^2
t=1.9s
1.9s-.25s=1.65s

x=1/2(9.81)(1.7)^2
x=4.9(1.7)^2
x=14m
x=18m-14m=4m
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks ok to me except for significant figures.
 
Tried 4.0 tells me I got the wrong answer.
 
I'll try giving this problem a shot.

We know that the initial height is 18m, and the final height for when the pelican swoops down is 0m.
From the equation Δ y= VoyT + .5gT2, we have to plug Yf as 0 m, Yi as 18m,and Voy as 0m/s.

-18m= .5gT2

√[-18/(.5g)]=T=1.9

(pelican to catch fish)-(time for fish to react)
1.9s-.25s=1.65
Yf-Yi= .5gT2

Yf-18= .5gT2
Yf=.5g(1.65)2+18=4.6m

So,it needs to see the pelican at 4.6m.

Sorry if I didn't write my English well enough.
 
Last edited:
One of my previous answers I entered was 4.7m. A slight discrepancy of about .1m and it still tells me I'm wrong so not exactly sure why it's telling me that. The concept and mathematics is suppose to work.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top