Optical spectrometer experiment

AI Thread Summary
An experiment is being planned to calculate Planck's constant using LEDs, involving a setup with a variable DC supply, voltmeter, LED, spectrometer, and diffraction grating. The individual is seeking alternatives to a diffraction grating, specifically inquiring about the feasibility of using a triangular prism to determine wavelength through refraction. It is suggested that, by knowing the energy gap of the LED, a calibration curve can be created by plotting minimum deviation angles against wavelengths. This curve could then be used to accurately determine the wavelength of the LED. The discussion emphasizes the practicality of using a prism in this context.
LoD
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I need to do an experiment to calculate Planck's constant from LEDs. Basically what I'm intending to do is a fairly simple variable dc supply->voltmeter->LED->spectrometer->diffraction grating->my eye type setup. I know how to do that, but the trouble is I'll need to track down a diffraction grating. What I'd like to know is, would it be possible to use a triangular prism instead and work out the wavelength using refraction? In theory it should, but would it in practice?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming that you know the energy gap E_g of the LED you can construct a calibration curve with the prism by plotting the minimum deviation angles, measured with the spectroscope, for various spectral lines, against their wavelengths. Use this curve to determine the wavelenght of the LED.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top