Optics: Distance of Key in swimming pool

  • Thread starter Thread starter circle_square
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Optics Swimming
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem involving optics and the distance to a lost key in a swimming pool. The problem involves calculating the angle of incidence using trigonometric functions and Snell's Law, with the initial calculations indicating an error in the approach. The correct method requires using the angle of incidence as the complement of the calculated angle when applying Snell's Law. The final distance to the key is derived from both the horizontal distance and the underwater distance, which needs to be recalculated based on the corrected angle. Accurate application of these principles is essential for finding the correct distance to the key.
circle_square
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Optics: Distance of Key in swimming pool

Homework Statement



After a long day of driving you take a late-night swim in a motel swimming pool. When you go to your room, you realize that you have lost your room key in the pool. You borrow a powerful flashlight and walk around the pool, shining the light into it. The light shines on the key, which is lying on the bottom of the pool, when the flashlight is held 1.2 m above the water surface and is directed at the surface a horizontal distance of 1.5 m from the edge

If the water here is 4.0 m deep, how far is the key from the edge of the pool?

Homework Equations


I'm not sure, but I used tan(x)= opposite/adjacent and Snell's Law, nsin(x)=nsin(x)

The Attempt at a Solution



The light forms two triangles, so I figured I needed to find the angle of the flashlight to the water first. That means tan(x)=1.2/1.5, and arctan(1.2/1.5) is 38.65 degrees.

From here, I used Snell's Law to figure out the angle in the water, and since the problem didn't state an index of refraction for water, I assumed the standard of 1.33 and used n=1 for air. This means sin(38.65)=1.33sin(x), or arcsin(sin(38.65)/1.33) which equals 28.01 degrees, which I rounded to 28 degrees. This meant the third angle of the underwater triangle is 62 degrees.

That means that to find the length of the bottom side of the triangle b, I needed to use tan(62)= 4/b, or b= 4/tan(62), which I solved to equal approximately 2.13 meters.

So, I figured that the total distance to the key is the horizontal distance of the flashlight plus the underwater distance. So I have 2.13m+1.5m= 3.63 meters, which is wrong according to the computer.

Any help would be greatly appreciated, please!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
circle_square said:

Homework Equations


I'm not sure, but I used tan(x)= opposite/adjacent and Snell's Law, nsin(x)=nsin(x)

The Attempt at a Solution



The light forms two triangles, so I figured I needed to find the angle of the flashlight to the water first. That means tan(x)=1.2/1.5, and arctan(1.2/1.5) is 38.65 degrees.

From here, I used Snell's Law to figure out the angle in the water, and since the problem didn't state an index of refraction for water, I assumed the standard of 1.33 and used n=1 for air. This means sin(38.65)=1.33sin(x),

The angle of incidence is the angle the light ray makes with the normal to the surface. So it should be (90-38.65)° which you should be using in Snell’s law.
 
Ah... stupid mistakes like that always throw me off...

Thanks a bunch!
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top