What is the Approximate Index of Refraction of a Transparent Liquid?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Perrin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Optics Refraction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the index of refraction of a transparent liquid based on the observed image of an object floating on its surface. Using Snell's law, the user attempts to derive the index of refraction by relating angles and distances in the setup. The dependency of the index on the variable x, which represents the distance from the observer to the object, is highlighted, raising questions about the validity of approximating x to zero for simplification. The user confirms that for small angles, certain approximations can be made, leading to a correct answer. The conversation concludes with a sense of resolution regarding the problem-solving approach.
Perrin
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The original problem:

A plane mirror is placed horizontally at the bottom of a transparent liquid of 10 cm depth. When one looks at the image of a small object floating at the surface of the liquid right above the object, the image is seen at 14 cm below the surface of the liquid. Find the approximate value of the index of refraction of the liquid.

Homework Equations



I used Snell's formula:
sin(alpha1)/sin(alpha2) = n2/n1

The Attempt at a Solution



http://www.dotcore.co.il/refraction_problem.jpg
I really hope this image is clear enough, unfortunately that's the top of my Gimp skills...

I said:
sin(alpha1)/sin(alpha2) = n2 (n1 = 1 because it's the index of refraction of air)

sin(alpha1) = BF/AF, sin(alpha2)=DC/AC
DC=FB=x, because the image as seen by the observer as result of the refraction is right above the original image
So:
n2 = (x/AF)/(x/AD) = AD/AF

According to the Pythagorean theorem:
AD = sqrt(x^2 + 20^2)
AF = sqrt(x^2 + 14^2)

Now to my problem:
Certainly, n2 depends on x. I remember my textbook saying that a point below the surface of a material with a higher index of refraction does not create a clear image, is that the reason of the dependency of n2 on x?
The book also said that for small distances, the image can be seen clearly. Does that mean that I can plug in a small value for x to get the correct answer? I tried plugging in x=0, and I got a correct answer. Is it valid to do that? Is that the reason the problem states "Find the approximate value"?

Thanks in advance for the help!
Perrin.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Pretty much that looks like it.

For a small angle I think you can reasonably take AF ≈ AB and AC ≈ AD.
 
OK, thanks for affirming my answer! I can sleep peacefully tonight :D
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top