Optimized Solving Net Displacement Problem w/ Sailboat Tacking

  • Thread starter Thread starter kaylaannreilly
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Displacement Net
AI Thread Summary
To solve the net displacement problem for a sailboat tacking against the wind, it's essential to use vector addition rather than simply summing the distances traveled. The sailboat's movements include three segments at specified angles, which need to be represented as vectors on a diagram. The key is to calculate the components of each vector and then add them together to find the resultant vector. Understanding the difference between total distance and net displacement is crucial for solving this problem accurately. Properly analyzing the diagram and calculating the vector components will lead to the correct net displacement and direction.
kaylaannreilly
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm have a hard time figuring out how to do this problem:
A sailboat tacking against the wind moves as follows: 3.8 km at 45° east of north, 4.5 km at 55° west of north, 2 km at 45° east of north. What is the net displacement for the entire motion? How many degrees east of north is the sailboat?

Homework Equations






The Attempt at a Solution


I thought that to find the net displacement you had to simply add the vectors:
3.8+4.5+2=10.3 However, this is not right and I don't understand how else to solve the problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Adding the vectors is exactly what you are supposed to do, but it's not what you did. You just added the individual magnitudes. You need to draw a diagram of what the boat is doing and go from there.
 
I did draw the picture but I'm not sure what to do with the picture.
 
kaylaannreilly said:
I did draw the picture but I'm not sure what to do with the picture.

Well, see, the thing is, even the best minds here are not mind READERS, so if you don't post it there's not going to be much we can do to help you.
 
You calculated the distance sailed not the net displacement. Do you understand the difference?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top