Optimizing Cost for Given Volume of a Cylinder

  • Thread starter Thread starter toasticles
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Multivariable
toasticles
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
if Cost(r)=0.01(2\pir2+v/\pir2(2\pir))+0.015(4\pir+v/\pir2)
v=hpir2
how does one show for the optimal radius/height for any volume i.e. where the cost will be the minimum for that volume?

all my attempts have ended with 0=0

help please? i'll give you cookehz ^^
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The first thing I would do is go ahead and replace "v" by \pi r^2 h:
cost(r, h)= 0.01(2\pi r^2+[v/(\pi r^2)](2\pi r)+0.015(4\pi r+v/(\pi r^2)
cost(r, h)= 0.01(2\pi r^2+[(\pi r^2h)/(\pi r^2)](2\pi r)+0.015(4\pi r+(\pi r^2 h)/(\pi r^2)
cost(r, h)= 0.01(2\pi r^2+ h(2\pi r)+ 0.015(4\pi r+ h))

Now differentiate with respect to both r and h:
Treating h as if it were a constant,
cost_r(r, h)= 0.01(4\pi r+ 2\pi h+ 0.015(4\pi))
cost_h(r, h)= 0.01(2\pi r+ 0.015)

To find the optimum height, set those both equal to 0 and solve the two equations for r and h. (Since there is no "h" in the second equation , it is particularly easy to solve it for r. Although it looks to me like there is a sign error- that will give a negative value for r.)
 
HallsofIvy said:
cost(r, h)= 0.01(2\pi r^2+ h(2\pi r)+ 0.015(4\pi r+ h))

i don't think this is right or if it is how did you get it so that the second part(0.15(4pir+h) is also multiplied by 0.01 as the 0.01 and 0.015 "segments" of the equation are separated completely by the addition sign? (i'm only first year calculus) so if it's a law or something please explain :D
 
toasticles said:
if Cost(r)=0.01(2\pir2+v/\pir2(2\pir)+0.015(4\pir+v/\pir2)
v=hpir2

i think its because your original brackets were a little ambiguous - why not use the method but with what you've got?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Replies
33
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
5K
Back
Top