Orbits and Kepler's Laws Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter hardygirl989
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Laws Orbits
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the period of the Sun's galactic motion and estimating the mass and number of stars in the Milky Way. The user successfully calculated the orbital period of the Sun as approximately 2.26x10^8 years but struggled with the mass of the Milky Way and the number of stars. They initially provided incorrect answers but were advised to express their results in scientific notation using the correct format, such as "1e41" for order of magnitude. After following this advice, the user confirmed that their notation was accepted, resolving their issues. The thread concludes with the user's problem being solved.
hardygirl989
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Studies of the relationship of the Sun to our galaxy—the Milky Way—have revealed that the Sun is located near the outer edge of the galactic disc, about 30 000 ly (1 ly = 9.46 1015 m) from the center. The Sun has an orbital speed of approximately 250 km/s around the galactic center.

(a) What is the period of the Sun's galactic motion?

___________ yr

(b) What is the order of magnitude of the mass of the Milky Way galaxy?

___________ kg

(c) Suppose the galaxy is made mostly of stars of which the Sun is typical. What is the order of magnitude of the number of stars in the Milky Way?

___________

Homework Equations



F=GMm/R^2
v=2∏Rf
GMT^2=4∏R^3

The Attempt at a Solution



a) I got the correct answer. I did:
v=2∏Rf=2∏R/T
T = 2∏R/v = 2∏(2.84x10^17Km)/250Km/s = 7.13x10^15 s
T = 7.13x10^15 s(1/3600)(1/24)(1/365) = 2.26x10^8 yr
b) I got this one wrong...
F = GMm/R^2 = Mv^2/R
M = v^2R/G = (250000 m/s * 2.84x10^20)/6.67x10^-11 = 2.66x10^41 Kg
c) I also got this wrong...
Number of Stars = 2.66*1041kg / 1.99*1030kg= 1.336*1011 stars


Can anyone help me out with the last two parts? I am not sure why they are wrong...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If they're asking for an order of magnitude, they might just want 10^{41} and 10^{11}, respectively (assuming those are the correct numbers, which they seem to be).
 
That makes sense.

The website says only one thing about scientific notation on their formatting page:
Incorrect format: 1.2E15 Correct Format: 1.2e15

I tried typing in e41 and it told me that it cannot understand what I wrote. I understand that you probably are not able to access the website, but do you have any suggestions that I can try?
 
In that notation, "e41" does not make sense, but "1e41" (=10^{41}) does make sense. I would recommend trying that, as well as 2.66e41. The only online homework submission site I am familiar with is WileyPlus, and on that system this notation would be accepted.
 
1e41 was correct! Thank you so much for your help! =D

SOLVED.
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'

Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'

In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Circular orbit change after gaining mass ejected from sun
Replies
1
Views
1K
Newton's Theory of Gravity: Calculating the Orbit of Our Solar System
Replies
4
Views
11K
Kepler's 3rd Law Question finding how long a year is for Pluto
Replies
2
Views
1K
What is the Mass of the Andromeda Galaxy?
Replies
5
Views
3K
Orbital Period of the Earth where the Sun's Mass Changes
Replies
6
Views
2K
How Can You Calculate Saturn's Mass Using a Telescope and Stopwatch?
Replies
9
Views
3K
Satellites Orbits and Energy Problem
Replies
7
Views
4K
Using Kepler's Law to find speed of a comet in orbit
Replies
8
Views
3K
Kepler's Laws, two large bodies
Replies
3
Views
1K
B What keeps most galactic stars from falling into the centeral black hole?
Replies
6
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top