I Order of summation in series with multiple indices

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the convergence of double-indexed series and the order of summation. It asserts that if the summation of the absolute values of the sequence converges, the order of summation does not affect the result. This principle is related to the "Re-ordering Theorem," also known as Mertens's theorem. An example illustrates the necessity of absolute convergence for the theorem to hold. The conversation encourages sharing found answers for the benefit of others facing similar questions.
user15197573
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Series property
Can someone help me understand why what I wrote is correct? That is: If I have a sequence with double indices and if the summation of the elements modules of this sequence converges (less than infinite) than it does not matter how I make this sum (second line) they are going to be always the same. Thank you.
USA AQUI.jpeg
edit: Guys, I've just found the answer to this question in another post but I don't know how to delete this.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Why not post the answer you found for the benefit of others who may find your post and who may have the same question. This would also allow us to comment on how good an answer it was and perhaps give you some deeper insight to your question.
 
  • Like
Likes user15197573
Sounds like a special case of Fubini's theorem to me.
 
  • Like
Likes user15197573
  • Like
Likes user15197573
jedishrfu said:
Why not post the answer you found for the benefit of others who may find your post and who may have the same question. This would also allow us to comment on how good an answer it was and perhaps give you some deeper insight to your question.
I'll take that into consideration in my next post since some people already answered here. Thank you.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top