P= F(t) • V(t) vs P = F • V to find power done

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vitani11
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating power as a function of time using the equations P = F(t) • V(t) and P = F • V. The force F(t) and velocity V(t) are provided as functions of time, leading to the question of whether to multiply or dot them. It is clarified that since both are scalar functions in a single dimension, they should simply be multiplied. The conclusion emphasizes that the scalar nature of the functions allows for straightforward multiplication to find power over time. Understanding this approach simplifies the calculation of power in this context.
Vitani11
Messages
275
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


What is the power delivered as a function of time?

F(t) = m(12t-8)
V(t) = (6t^2-8t)

Homework Equations


P = FV vs. P = F • V

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm given a force and velocity as functions of time. When I find power, do I multiply or dot them? I know you should dot when force and velocity are defined vectors, but here they are generalized and not represented by vectors but actually by functions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just multiply them. If they are given as scalar functions rather than vectors, it is implicit that all motion and force operates in a single dimension.
 
  • Like
Likes Vitani11
andrewkirk said:
Just multiply them. If they are given as scalar functions rather than vectors, it is implicit that all motion and force operates in a single dimension.
Right... these are only in terms of a single dimension and vary with time - I don't know what was going on with my brain there. Thanks!
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top