Parallel light rays refraction by glass hemisphere problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a homework problem involving the refraction of parallel light rays through a glass hemisphere. The main equation used is derived from the paraxial approximation for spherical surfaces, accounting for the sign convention based on the surface's curvature. The contributor suggests setting the object distance to infinity due to the parallel nature of the rays, leading to a derived formula for the image distance. For the second part of the problem, a slight increase in the index of refraction is considered to determine its effect on the focus point. The contributor seeks validation of their method and calculations, indicating confidence in their approach.
marational
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Parallel light rays travel from air towards a glass hemisphere with radius R and
index of refraction ng > nair. A top view is shown in the figure.
http://img8.imageshack.us/img8/6380/parallellightrays.jpg
(a) Determine where the light rays come to a focus relative to the point P.
(b) The index of refraction of the hemisphere is increased by 0.5 percent. Does the
focus point change from that in part (a)? If it changes, then by how much?

Homework Equations


I found an equation in the textbook for paraxial rays approaching a spherical surface that is convex towards them. In that situation, the second medium was some glass, and the original medium was air. The equation was given as follows:
n1/s + n2/s' = (n2-n1)/R
where s is object distance (from which the paraxial rays originated) from the surface, and s' is the distance of the image formed from the surface. R is the radius of the sphere.

The Attempt at a Solution


The big difference between the two scenarios is that in the actual problem, the rays are approaching a surface that is concave towards them, rather than convex. However, the textbook states that according to the sign convention for refracting surfaces, R is positive when convex toward the object, and negative when concave toward the object.
I simply put this into the equation to give
n1/s + n2/s' = (n2-n1)/-R
n1/s + n2/s' = (n1-n2)/R
where n1 is the index of refraction for the glass, and n2 is the index for air
The other issue was that there isn't really an object distance in the problem.
Since the rays are parallel, I set s to infinity (making n1/s = 0) and arranged for s'.
n2/s' = (n1-n2)/R
R(n2/(n1-n2)) = s'

I suppose this would be my final answer for part a, but I'm unsure if my method works.

If I'm correct, I figured that for part b I could simply multiply n2 by 1.005.

Any help would be appreciated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks correct.

ehild
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top